Monday will be the day of high drama (or anti-climax) at party conference

Monday, 20th September: nuclear power, free schools and Nick Clegg’s conference speech. Drama, protest and dissension or quiet compromise, careful management and enthusiastic standing ovation?

It’s no coincidence that both potential controversies are scheduled for the same day as Clegg’s speech: in the worst case situation, all the bad news would be be concentrated on the one day and Clegg will still get the final word (or rather, many words) on the day with his speech coming after the possible flashpoints*.

However, it’s unlikely to come to that as the two motions are carefully worded. Nuclear power gets a mention in the motion on green taxation, but as the motion is about taxation rather than energy it will be hard for anyone to submit a valid amendment which makes the debate into one of “nuclear, yes or no?”.

Likewise, the wording of the motion on academy and free schools minimises the chances of a direct flashpoint as the motion is clearly hostile to them, restates the party’s belief in the key role for local authorities, calls for an equal financial playing field for schools – and then goes on to urge people not to take part in free schools, rather than directly criticising the government for introducing them.

Instead, we’re much more likely to see some strongly expressed speeches, a chance to be clear about where the party would do something different if it were in a majority government on its own rather than the smaller partner in a coalition and then a warmly received leader’s speech.

As for why this is all happening on the Monday of conference rather than the final day? Nick Clegg will be in New York on the Wednesday of conference, representing the country as Deputy Prime Minister at the United Nations.

The full texts of all the motions is in the agenda booklet, which is available as a pdf here.

* I may be sticking my neck out here, by I don’t think there will be a counted vote in the debate which happens after Clegg’s speech on amending the fourth sentence of standing order 8.3 so that rights of reply can be skipped when there’s nothing to reply to.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

4 Comments

  • Awaiting Labour trolls – postings with the words `savage`, `poorest`, `most vulnerable`, `dickensian`, `sold out`, please insert below

  • I think you are too optimistic. The press will report the schools motion as ‘LDs reject Colation policy’ and this will overshadow Clegg’s speech.
    Better to have got this motion over with earlier.

  • Well said John true words indeed apart from the labour troll bit.
    Seriousley though im glad its all a big joke to you and if the horrors of the new Tory government hit you and yours as hard as me and my family (public sector worker/disabled children/social housing) then I trust you will keep laughing.Still my deep fears for my family and country under the Tory shark and its Lib Dem pilot fish obviousley make me a troll.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ SimonR, There some other advantages. Such as: you can't be sacked if you own your own business! You can put your partner and children on the payroll even i...
  • Andy Daer
    Tom, thanks for this excellent summary. Steve, it was hubris that led that "London adult" to think his hurt was so important - he was on the radio shortly afte...
  • Simon R
    @Katharine: 3 year default tenancy and no evictions other than for breaking the contract? Umm... how does that work if - say - for some reason, I have to move a...
  • Simon R
    @Peter Martin: Yes you're correct that, if you run a small business, taking your income as dividend will typically mean paying less tax than if you take it as a...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Thanks for the support on the share buybacks proposed policy, Peter Martin. Just now I want to add a few facts about what we want to offer young people on housi...