Liberal Democrats ensure government gives added protection for journalists’ records

Police will need to get a judge to give them permission before they access journalists’ phone records, according to the BBC.

A temporary measure means officers must follow the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and get legal permission to obtain any communications data.

The move comes after strong criticism of the way police were using the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa) to access journalists’ sources.

The Home Office said it was an “interim solution” ahead of the next parliament.

It was the Liberal Democrats and Nick Clegg in particular who pushed for this change:

A spokesman Mr Clegg said: “We’re glad the Tories have finally found some sense and have at least agreed to ensure temporary measures are put in place to protect journalist sources.

“Whilst temporary measures are better than none, we will not stop pushing to ensure permanent safeguards are put in place.”

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Tony Greaves 21st Feb '15 - 9:49pm

    Just don’t expect any journalists to be grateful. No mention of the LDs in any o f the coverage I’ve seen so far.

    Tony

  • Philip Thomas 21st Feb '15 - 9:56pm

    The BBC’s lead story mentions one Nick Clegg. True, they don’t reveal his party affiliation…

  • Tony – it was mentioned favourably in the Sun, of all places, with a photo of Julian Huppert. To be fair, neither you nor I would usually read that rag but it was lying about as I was waiting to have my hair cut …

  • Tony

    Liberal values are not being pushed for personal gain surely everyone should see this as a simple matter of principle for any liberal.

  • This is in the right direction but it’s only a very small step. There is all sorts of scope for confusion – deliberate or otherwise – about who is or isn’t a journalist and then there is always the other party to a conversation who presumably remains at risk.

    Surely the principle should be that to access private information the police must have a warrant just as they do to enter your home. That means a starting position of reasonable suspicion, not just a shopping trip. I would be sympathetic (subject to what others might say) to a system that automatically allowed that initial warrant to extend to collecting metadata (but not listen in) from contacts of the suspect to see if they are perhaps part of a network but to go further should require a new warrant.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Brad Barrows
    @expats I think it is well over the top to suggest that passing a law to make electoral fraud more difficult is something that you could expect from a dictator...
  • Helen Dudden
    Our country is a total mess. That's about all we can honestly say. Was Dawn Butler right to call the Prime Minister a li..? I thought that we needed huma...
  • Joe Bourke
    John, the comments mean what they say "I think the issue of resources and funding is more important than the precise structure of devolved authorities." The...
  • Helen Dudden
    The sky has finally fallen. Always knew it would. Eeyore. My sympathies are for the many who have sunk into deep depression, as this situation sinks lower and...
  • John Marriott
    I believe in PR because it’s fair to all parties; not because I think it will deliver a Lib Dem government. Provided that you get at least 5% of the popular v...