LibLink: Brian Paddick: If we value our national security, we will avoid a hard Brexit

A couple of days before Theresa May’s ill-judged ultimatum in her Article 50 letter over trade and security, Brian Paddick wrote for the Guardian about how hard Brexit could damage our security. That’s right. If Theresa May gets her way, we will be less safe.

He started off by talking about last week’s attack at Westminster in which 4 people, PC Keith Palmer, Aysha Frade, Leslie Rhodes and Kurt Cochran were murdered. How do we balance the need to keep Parliament accessible with the safety of those in and around it?

That security must be balanced with an obligation to keep parliament open to the people. We shouldn’t turn Westminster into Fort Knox, even if such a thing were possible. But we can improve security, for politicians, staff and, crucially, police on the frontline.

Those officers are not armed. Armed support is a distance away. No one wants an ostentatious display of force, which would only increase that sense of alienation many feel about “Westminster”. But this attack shows, alas, that armed officers should be directly behind that frontline. Otherwise lives will be lost that could be saved. In this attack, I gather, it was only because a minister’s armed close protection officer happened to be close by that the assailant was stopped.

While millions are spent on surveillance powers and the security services, over the past six years £1bn has been cut from the Metropolitan police budget. That’s huge.

He went on to talk about how a hard Brexit could compromise our security effort both in cost and co-operation. 

Apologies for being “so Lib Dem”– as the anti-hard Brexit party – but if we avoid a Brexit that will cost the public finances £100bn, we could afford better security, while also working closely with our friends across the Channel through the pooling of intelligence and the European arrest warrant. I struggle to see how you can have a hard Brexit and safer streets.

The government’s plan to collect and store all our web histories for a year is expensive, ineffective and disproportionate. The creation and maintenance of this system is likely to cost over £1bn, money that could be better spent restoring police numbers in our community.

Whether it is working with communities or other intelligence agencies, we should work together. Terrorists want division, and we should not be so foolish as to give it to them. Let us remain open, tolerant and united.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • “Apologies for being “so Lib Dem”– as the anti-hard Brexit party – but if we avoid a Brexit that will cost the public finances £100bn, we could afford better security”

    I’d love to know how he’s so certain that Brexit will cost the public finances £100 bn. The reason so few people believe politicians these days is because all sides use figures that are little more than a guess.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMartin 20th Nov - 8:23pm
    Sandra Hammett: In the end you have to ask the membership, no formal arrangement can take place without a formal members' vote. In the circumstances...
  • User AvatarRossMcL 20th Nov - 7:10pm
    The broad principle is clear: we want to form a government of our own, and if we can't do that we've said we would not...
  • User AvatarSandra Hammett 20th Nov - 7:00pm
    @Mick Taylor Hi Clear on Johnson and Corbyn of course, and Chuka Umunna has said that neither the Tory or Labour are a fit for...
  • User AvatarRichard Underhill. 20th Nov - 6:45pm
    What if the kids are hungry in the mornings, in class, before school dinners? Should breakfasts be provided?
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 20th Nov - 6:36pm
    Perhaps Sandra Hammett should listen to what Jo Swinson has repeatedly said. "We will not put either Johnson or Corbyn into power, because neither are...
  • User Avatarnvelope2003 20th Nov - 6:01pm
    I would be surprised if any British Prime Minister would use nuclear weapons but to say that in public would invite our enemies to take...