Writing for Public Service, Lord (Chris) Rennard has focused on just how unusual the House of Lords is:
In one of the many debates in the House of Lords about its future, I recently explained how, “like many noble lords, I take great pleasure in occasionally being able to show visitors around this place. Sometimes they are parliamentarians from other countries. Often they ask ‘How do you become a Lord?’ When you begin by explaining that perhaps your ancestors fought with the King in battle hundreds of years ago, or perhaps that they were what have been called ‘special friends’ of the King, these visitors look at you in amazement.”
Lesotho is the only other country in the world that maintains the hereditary principle for membership of a legislature. My visitors then invariably ask “how did you come to be here?” I then have to explain the powers of patronage conferred on our party leaders and how all but a few of the non-hereditary members are appointed. As a former party chief executive I have seen at close quarters the distorting effects on our democracy of this system of patronage. Leaders can appoint their friends or people who have helped them and block critics in their own party or people who have been known to disagree with their views. It is a simple matter of democratic principle for me to that those who make our laws should be chosen by all those subject to them.
You can read Chris Rennard’s piece on Lords reform in full here.
* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
One in the eye for the Tory Bayeux Tapestry as Labour hits back
What do Britain's death-penalty cheerleaders have to say about Christa Pike?
A Week in Politics #8
Reform continue to block journalists from doing their job
Nonconformistradical
Joey Vimsante
Jenny Barnes
paul barker
2 Comments
He’s absolutely right, if course, but he expresses it with nowhere near the appropriate level of outrage.
I don’t think Chris does outrage. If you hear him speak he is about the most reasonable sounding person I know of.
Other the other hand, he can express a very clear and precise analysis of a situation and his track record is one of effective action.