LibLink Christine Jardine: Why cruel laws forbidding terminally ill people from ending their life must change

Edinburgh West’s Lib Dem MP Christine Jardine has long been an advocate for a change in the law to allow assisted dying in limited circumstances. Ahead of Labour MP Kim Leadbetter introducing a Private Member’s Bill  “to allow adults who are terminally ill, subject to safeguards and protections, to request and be provided with assistance to end their own life; and for connected purposes,” Christine set out why she supports it in her Scotsman column.

Why is she supporting Kim’s Bill?

Because I recognise the widespread demand to address an inequality in the law and for legislators like myself to debate whether a change to offer that choice is needed.

I have never made any secret of my belief that the current situation is unacceptable. The law does not offer compassion and choice but instead can seem inhumane and cruel.

She cites a comprehensive inquiry by the Commons Select Committee on Health and Social Care:

It received thousands of submissions and heard hours of testimony from all sides of the debate. It also interrogated evidence from parts of the world where the laws that will be under debate here were implemented years ago.

The committee’s final report provides exactly the sort of evidence on which the upcoming debate will draw and decisions will be made when the bill comes before parliament. For me, the most significant finding was confirmation that palliative care, however good, is not always sufficient to relieve suffering. And, curiously, that care often improves after assisted dying legislation is introduced.

She concluded by saying that she didn’t feel she had the right to deny choice to people at the end of their lives:

I don’t know what I would want to do faced with a terminal diagnosis and potentially painful death. Whether I would want palliative care alone or the option to end it when and if I felt that care was no longer enough.

But I would want that choice to be mine. More importantly perhaps I feel I don’t have the right to deny that choice to others. I believe the law as it stands does not offer those facing such circumstances the compassionate and humane options they deserve.

You can read her whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

This post has pre moderation enabled, please be patient whilst waiting for it to be manually reviewed. Liberal Democrat Voice is made up of volunteers who keep the site running in their free time.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Hirst
    I'm not sure liberalism is all about equalising wealth. But it's certainly a large chunk of it. Reward is also important though there are greater rewards than w...
  • Peter Hirst
    I love this quote from The New Deal. For a publc utility like water it is especially true. To give shareholders dividends the company must first show it respect...
  • Peter Hirst
    What struck me about this post was the reference to 2019. We're told to build on our successes. We can also build on our failures if we get the messaging right....
  • Peter Martin
    “But you’re a Lib Dem, I thought your party didn’t like unions.” You have to ask why people think this. LibDems are largely seen as well m...
  • Alex Macfie
    What's needed is to make the rail service operationally independent of government. There is absolutely no sense in GB-wide passenger rail services being microma...