Edinburgh West’s Lib Dem MP Christine Jardine has long been an advocate for a change in the law to allow assisted dying in limited circumstances. Ahead of Labour MP Kim Leadbetter introducing a Private Member’s Bill “to allow adults who are terminally ill, subject to safeguards and protections, to request and be provided with assistance to end their own life; and for connected purposes,” Christine set out why she supports it in her Scotsman column.
Why is she supporting Kim’s Bill?
Because I recognise the widespread demand to address an inequality in the law and for legislators like myself to debate whether a change to offer that choice is needed.
I have never made any secret of my belief that the current situation is unacceptable. The law does not offer compassion and choice but instead can seem inhumane and cruel.
She cites a comprehensive inquiry by the Commons Select Committee on Health and Social Care:
It received thousands of submissions and heard hours of testimony from all sides of the debate. It also interrogated evidence from parts of the world where the laws that will be under debate here were implemented years ago.
The committee’s final report provides exactly the sort of evidence on which the upcoming debate will draw and decisions will be made when the bill comes before parliament. For me, the most significant finding was confirmation that palliative care, however good, is not always sufficient to relieve suffering. And, curiously, that care often improves after assisted dying legislation is introduced.
She concluded by saying that she didn’t feel she had the right to deny choice to people at the end of their lives:
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
Like us on Facebook
Subscribe to our feed
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Government must do more to help people onto the housing ladder
The foxes who visited London Zoo with deadly intent
9 tips for speaking at a Liberal Democrat conference
Tanya Park 
Jana 
Jason Connor 
Tim 