LibLink: Mark Pack – I was wrong about the Budget

Writing over on his work blog, Lib Dem Voice’s Mark Pack withdraws one Budget prediction and offers us three others instead:

Cunning negotiating strategy or basic mistake? Whatever the view you have of the tax motion at Liberal Democrat conference and Stephen Williams’s speech moving it, my interpretation of it was wrong.

Far from signalling the determination of the party’s leadership to see the 50p tax rate remain, it was in fact a sideshow and the rate will go. A kind interpretation is that standing by the 50p rate so publicly was part of a negotiating strategy to extract greater concessions from the Tories on other tax changes. A less kind interpretation is that it was a mistake to put to party conference a motion supporting the 50p rate just before agreeing to drop it, even if in return for other changes…

The challenge for the Liberal Democrats is that promises about making the richest pay more by cracking down on tax avoidance and evasion do not sound new or credible. It has become a regular part of Budgets for the Chancellor to promise this. A new round of promises this week will need to have enough substance to make them sound more significant than just a repeat of the usual formalities.

Likewise, speeding up the moves towards a £10,000 allowance would be very popular, but of limited political gain for the Liberal Democrats as getting to £10,000 is in the Coalition Agreement already. Speeding up implementation would be good as it would bring more benefits, sooner. But it is a relatively small gain.

So what does Mark think will happen? Read his full post for the three replacement predictions.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.


  • I hope you’re right with those predictions that appear on your work blog, Mark, because if we’ve given way on the 50p tax rate for just some promises about cracking down on tax avoidance then I despair. How is that even a concession? Cracking down on tax avoidance shouldn’t need us to give way on anything. I really hope we’ve got more for abandoning the 50p than I am reading and hearing about the in the media.

  • @Stuart – “Cracking down on tax avoidance shouldn’t need us to give way on anything.”

    I do so agree. There is no obvious tackling of tax avoidance – it still goes on and on and on! We all know people who are squirreling away money offshore, creating “dummy companies” in which to hide their assets, going into bankruptcy and showing up on Companies Register as having assets of Nil one day and starting a new company the next day with such low assets they are not taxable.

    Does the Government think that we, at the grass roots and the sharp end, are stupid? We all know where to look to find people who are being downright dishonest. The problem is – what can we actually do about it when the Government is clearly NOT cracking down on these tax avoiders!

    I despair too! No-one is listening!

  • Matthew Huntbach 20th Mar '12 - 11:18am

    Mark Pack

    A less kind interpretation is that it was a mistake to put to party conference a motion supporting the 50p rate just before agreeing to drop it, even if in return for other changes

    My interpretation is that this was a deliberate insult to the Liberal Democrats intended to provoke us, with the end view being that either the coalition collapses or it carries on but the Liberal Democrat party outside Parliament collapses.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRichard Easter 11th Jul - 9:19am
    I tend to ignore too much talk of "Marxists" in this day and age. It is very unlikely that even many socialists want the full...
  • User AvatarJock Coats 11th Jul - 8:14am
    Sue, thanks you. As an anarchist I wholly agree. I was just toning it down a little for his lordship :)
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 11th Jul - 7:45am
    You know, looking at it, the Treaty of Lisbon with the EU was a marvellous thing. Freedom of movement of people, goods, services and capital....
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 11th Jul - 7:37am
    More has to change than a simple switch to busses. First we have to de-carbonise transport as the number one priority - Hydrogen or Elctricity....
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Jul - 6:59am
    "The Government needs to step up and provide extra support ...." This doesn't sound like the 'fiscally responsible' 'put a penny on income tax' Lib...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Jul - 6:29am
    "The housing market is a good example of structural problems." Many don't see it as a problem at all. High house prices are necessary to...