LibLink: Mark Pack – Lib Dems Must Not Ditch Commitment To Political Reform

Over at The Holmes Report website, Lib Dem Voice’s Mark Pack has a piece setting out how the Liberal Democrats should approach the issue of political reform in the wake of the substantial defeat for reformers in the AV referendum. Here’s an extract from Mark’s piece:

It would be a mistake for Liberal Democrats (or indeed reformers in the Conservative Party’s ranks) to conclude from the referendum result that all political reform should now be side-lined. The referendum No vote was not a vote of confidence in our political system. Politicians continue to be one of the least respected professions in Britain.

But particularly for the Liberal Democrats, it would be a mistake to think that the route back to the party’s early 2010 levels of popularity lies in abandoning a long-held party demand. Constitutional reform is not top of the public’s list of priorities – which is why Lib Dem prominence on issues such as the NHS is important – but it’s no secret that it has long been top of the Liberal Democrats’ list of priorities. Giving up on it would not only be controversial with activists, it would trigger a round of media headlines about u-turns, splits, leadership weakness and going back on previous policies.

Nick Clegg told Radio 4 in August last year, “I wouldn’t have stood for the leadership of the Lib Dems if I thought the only sole purpose in life was to change the electoral system”. The repeated enthusiasm with which he made the point at the time – before the AV vote – caused some controversy but the essence of it still applies. Political reform was not the only priority on the front page of the 2010 general election manifesto – but it was there, asone of the set of four.

One of the perks of being in government is that it gives enough media profile to be able to talk about more than one issue – not many more, but more than one.

You can read the whole article here.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

One Comment

  • It’s the Conservatives and Labour who should be accused of “u-turns, splits, leadership weakness and going back on previous policies” if Lords reform doesn’t happen. As Nick likes to say, this was in all 3 manifestos. It can, however, thankfully stay out of the limelight for the next year during this committee stage.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlan Brown 24th Nov - 12:56pm
    As this article shows there many diverse organisations working towards remain in the EU. It seems to me that what is lacking is a powerful...
  • User AvatarArnold Kiel 24th Nov - 12:18pm
    I have not followed the UK's budget history closely, but I see no news here. The only remarkable difference is that the OBR has finally...
  • User Avatarjames 24th Nov - 12:18pm
    why then did she complain about the same thing to Nadine Dorries?
  • User Avatartheakes 24th Nov - 12:13pm
    Nobody is saying do not make these weekly reports, it is the misleading headlines which would do justice in the Daily Mail. We could quite...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 24th Nov - 12:06pm
    The state of the economy has been poor for the last decade. The vote for brexit is a reflection of this rather than the cause...
  • User AvatarRebecca Taylor 24th Nov - 11:54am
    @PJ - in a way a recognised qualification does a similar role to accreditation, i.e. it proves you've been trained with the skills X role(s)...