LibLink: Martin Thomas invokes the Bribery Act…

The noble and learned Lord Thomas of Gresford, QC, waded into the debate on “Government investments in communities where Labour MPs might be willing to support the Government” in a letter to The Times on Saturday.

PORK-BARREL BRIBES

Sir, The offer of cash subsidies to an MP for the benefit of his or her constituents provided the MP votes for the government’s withdrawal agreement is a breach of section 1 of the Bribery Act 2010 (“May woos Labour MPs with cash to back Brexit”, Jan 31, and letters, Feb 1). The MP party to such an agreement is in breach of Section 2. A minister who gives a financial or political advantage to an MP intending to bring about the improper performance of his or her duty to vote in good faith, impartially or in accordance with a position of trust, breaches Section 1. Receiving the advantage intending to act improperly breaches Section 2.

In deciding whether the casting of a vote has been performed improperly, the test of what is expected is a test of what a reasonable person in the UK would expect in relation to the performance of that public duty. If the government discriminated in favour of one deprived area against another on the basis of the vote cast by its MP, no reasonable jury would conclude in its favour. Pork-barrelling is a euphemism for corruption. It may be ingrained in the US, but the Bribery Act kills it in the UK. Another brief for the attorney general.

Lord Thomas of Gresford, QC
House of Lords

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary published in print or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

4 Comments

  • ……………. If the government discriminated in favour of one deprived area against another on the basis of the vote cast by its MP, no reasonable jury would conclude in its favour. …………

    Three letters, D.U.P.

  • Andrew Toye 4th Feb '19 - 2:40pm

    By this reasoning, any political deal or pact could be ruled unlawful (including the 2010 coalition agreement). However Parliament is subject to various privileges and immunities so government business can proceed without constant legal challenges. Local government is no so fortunate, so we should be very careful where this all leads.

  • Jayne Mansfield 4th Feb '19 - 9:46pm

    The scandalous fact is that in 2016 the government denied that they had entered into any special deal with Nissan.

  • OnceALibDem 6th Feb '19 - 8:52am

    Not sure he wants to go there. I’m not sure the way LIb Dem MPs in the coalition got funding for particular schemes in their constituencies – IIRC Danny Alexander was praised on here for how he had ‘delivered for Inverness’ and he wasn’t the only one by any means – would stand up to similar scrutiny.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 23rd Aug - 9:38pm
    Michael BG, there is a good discussion of the issues around affordability and phasing on the Citizens Income trust site https://citizensincome.org/faqs/#Howpay
  • User AvatarMark Blackburn 23rd Aug - 9:07pm
    It’s deliberate. These kind of people know that if they expose themselves, the truth will out, so they avoid the risk. Far better to push...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 23rd Aug - 9:03pm
    @ Geoffrey Dron. No problem, Geoffrey, just keep off the Scottish ginger beer. @ TCO. If you're insinuating what you appear to be insinuating, and...
  • User AvatarGeoffrey Dron 23rd Aug - 8:57pm
    @Richard Kemp -accepted. Now LibDems must press for extended devolution in the N of England https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/uk/we-want-100-per-cent-devolution-across-the-north-business-leaders-urge-boris-johnson-1-9914989
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 23rd Aug - 8:49pm
    It seems that "Revoke to have a Referendum later" would be Illegal. Asking for another Extension ( would that be the 3rd or 4th ?...
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 23rd Aug - 8:19pm
    They have an obvious solution in front of them : invite Johnson, Corbyn & Swinson on every Day & if the first two dont turn...
Sat 24th Aug 2019
Thu 29th Aug 2019
Mon 9th Sep 2019