LibLink: Paul Burstow on leaving the elderly at death’s door

Paul BurstowIn the Telegraph today, Paul Burstow expresses his concerns for social care under the Conservative Government. He writes:

Ninety per cent of NHS leaders now believe that social care cuts are directly affecting patient care, while social care leaders report that over half of the providers they work with are facing financial difficulties. This is not sustainable.

Social care has always been the poor relation of the NHS, but in the last Government, Norman Lamb and I made the reform of social care a priority, and, we made more progress in five years than the previous government did in thirteen. We secured an extra £7.2 billion, reformed social care law putting well-being and prevention centre stage, limited individual exposure to care costs and made sure no one should ever again have to sell their home to pay for care. And we laid the groundwork for bringing the NHS and social care together with one budget.

But he sees all that being placed at risk.

But against a backdrop of further deep cuts to local authority budgets, this could never go far enough. Social care has had it tough, but the next five years could make the last five years seem like the good days.

The Care Act was designed to end the postcode lottery of who was entitled to care and to significantly broaden access to publicly funded support – with the introduction of a cap on care costs and a much more generous approach to means testing. It also aims to drive improvements in the quality of care by discouraging 15-minute visits and putting well-being at the heart of everything.

But cash strapped Councils are struggling to make the change from crisis response to prevention. And will the cap on life time care costs and more generous means test due to start in April 2016 see the light of day? The Treasury could see this as a quick win for cashable savings, throwing the whole question of who pays for care in the air.

You can read the full article here.

 

 

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

2 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Steve Trevethan
    "(Lord Justice Reed) said crucially that it was up to the government and not the courts to decide who and what really poses a security risk. This may sound reas...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ Peter Martin, Perhaps if I had described it as a "liberal" issue, you might have grounds to take offence. But I didn't - the title suggests that liberals s...
  • Roland
    @Joseph Bourke "It has always been something of a puzzle that British civil servants have been able to establish practical governance and institutional arran...
  • Joseph Bourke
    Muellbaeur writes in his introduction; "Among the G7 countries, the UK has had the largest rise in house prices relative to average disposable income since 197...
  • Peter Martin
    @ David Raw, Yes I agree with you on the point of it not being a party matter. But it was Mark V who has described the plight of a young woman as being a "li...
Thu 11th Mar 2021