LibLink | Paul Tyler: Lords’ Question Time is a “farcical free-for-all”

Lord Tyler writes over at e-Politix today about the way Question Time is conducted in the Lords:

As the House’s membership has increased in recent months, Question Time has become an ever more farcical free-for-all. There are a large number of Members who wish to contribute at any one time. Newcomers are rightly mystified by the absurd way in which one has to jockey for the opportunity to speak. You have to pop up and start bellowing, ‘My Lords’, in the hope that your bellow will be more thundersome than those of competing Members, or that some Lordly recognition of your particular position or seniority or expertise, or whatever, will persuade others to sit down and allow you to put your question.

We have regular shouts of “this side”, as either Labour or the Conservatives argue over which benches should go next. Most extraordinarily of all, when these playground-like exchanges reach an impasse, a government minister is relied upon to stand up and say “I think we’ll have Baroness So and So now, and then move on to Lord Such and Such”. In effect, then, the Executive can choose whom it is questioned by and in what order.

Meanwhile, sitting with a comprehensive view of the whole chamber is a highly competent person – the Lord Speaker – who would be best placed to make the call as to who should speak next. Yet our antiquated rules mean she must be as silent as the Woolsack on which she sits.

It was her realisation that this anomaly – among others – was absurd that led Baroness Hayman to stimulate initial discussions on how our practices could be improved.

Paul goes on to describe the recommendations of the Leader’s Group on Working Practices, including on the length and nature of questions, as well as examining the case for allowing Commons ministers in to answer questions in the Lords and vice versa.

You can read Lord Tyler’s full post at ePolitix and the full report of the Leader’s Group here.

Lord Tyler is Co-Chair of the Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Policy Committee on Constitutional and Political Reform.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink and Parliament.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarTom Harney 25th Feb - 7:18am
    Although the housing problem is a complex one, a basic question needs to be dealt with. What do we do about poverty in the country....
  • User AvatarDavid Evershed 25th Feb - 12:26am
    On a development site with approval for 100 homes: - sometimes the approval is in phases governed by the planning conditions - builders can not...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 24th Feb - 10:58pm
    I am an Unionist albeit one that lives in England. But I'd suggest several things to preserve the union. 1. We and the other unionist...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 24th Feb - 10:12pm
    @TCO Council tenants are not allowed to sublet their premises. And no, many Councils do not have suitable smaller accomodation to offer for tenants to...
  • User AvatarMichael 1 24th Feb - 10:10pm
    My understanding is that councils can now borrow more for their own commercial undertakings and some (many ?) are doing that to fund their own...
  • User AvatarHywel 24th Feb - 8:59pm
    "Whoever you are, the Liberal Democrats will stand up for you" Homophobes, transphobes, racists, holocaust deniers, anti-vaxxers Are those in the 'whoever' the Lib Dems...