LibLink: Tavish Scott MSP: Scots should put money on devo plus.

Tavish Scott has been writing for the Scotsman, comparing the necessary treaty for a currency union which would be required between an independent Scotland and the UK, and the idea of “Devo Plus” which, he argues, would give the Scottish Government more powers than independence.

First he tackles the realities of that treaty for currency union:

With the removal of political representation at Westminster following a Yes vote, the flexibility of a parliament will need to be replaced with a treaty. This will be neither flexible nor short. It will have to cover all aspects of monetary union starting with the role of the Bank of England. It will need to set out any representation Scotland would have on the various Bank of England committees and particularly the monetary policy committee which sets interest rates. The rules for the MPC cover such factors as inflation rates, currency strength and economic stimulation. These would need to be clearly defined. The MPC would also need to assess the relative weighting of the Scottish economy in making decisions and there would need to be agreed principles on how new money would be issued, and on quantitative easing. Any new money would then need to be shared between Scotland and the rest of the UK in some pre-agreed way. Self evidently none of this is easy.

And Alex Salmond would have to agree with George Osborne:

Of course, monetary union only works where the nations involved are prepared to have broadly similar attitudes to public sector borrowing, including off-balance-sheet debts such as unfunded pension liabilities. The Eurozone crisis has demonstrated that a single currency in regions with widely differing attitudes to fiscal debt and economic management causes tension. So Alex Salmond would have to agree with George Osborne.

So what would Devo Plus give us that independence wouldn’t?

The reality for Scotland’s economic future is that Devo Plus would give 
Holyrood ministers far greater powers to shape policy to a Scottish agenda than independence. Alex Salmond would be better off with Devo Plus. Those in politics who want the best of both worlds, a stronger Scotland within the UK, will consider their options in the early part of 2014. Devo Plus provides a cogent case that underpins exactly that outcome.

There is a saying: “be careful what you wish for”. It would be ironic if we ended up with a Yes vote, but in the process had tied ourselves to a system which no longer gave us any political representation without controlling many of the important powers needed to reform Scotland. That would not be independence nor would it be in Scotland’s interests.

You can read the full article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

One Comment

  • To me, an Englishman, the above pieces make perfect common sense. I must confess to having “form” insofar as Mr Salmond is amongst a number of politicians (almost all English) whom I wouldn’t trust any further than I could throw. Sorry Alex, but that’s life!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    @ Nonconformistradical. So you're saying that the correct sentence was imposed albeit for the wrong reasons. You could be right about the sentence. But we...
  • Simon
    Paul your wrong about Lambeth. That is a Green minority administration. The Lib Dems voted to allow the Greens to take up the leadership but given their betraya...
  • Ben Austin
    Hi Paul, Just a correction, the Lambeth Lib Dems are not in coalition with the Lambeth Green Party. The Lambeth Greens are running a minority administration....
  • Matt Wardman
    I'm not convinced by heavy targeting of the most wealthy - and 1-2% a year is heavy, no matter how we phrase it. For example as one comparison, an investment i...
  • Neil Hickman
    @Simon - I think you should also note that Dan Neidle goes a long way beyond the "oh, we can't possibly touch the obscenely wealthy" position. He specifically a...