LibLink: Willie Rennie: Our MPs will vote to extend military operations beyond Iraq

Willie Rennie has written for The National, Scotland’s independence supporting newspaper about why Liberal Democrat MPs are supporting airstrikes in Syria. That view is not likely to find many supporters amongst the National’s readers.

We agree with those who say further diplomatic progress is needed. It is vital the UK Government uses all efforts to support the Vienna peace talks and any military action by the UK must be part of an international effort involving all those who have an interest in defeating Daesh.

What we have seen in recent months is the emergence of a more coherent international approach towards a diplomatic solution in Syria that involves countries such as Iran and Russia for the first time. The last time the House of Commons voted on intervention in Syria in 2013, this was not the case. There are no easy answers on any question relating to whether UK forces should take part in military action.

I know that there are people on both sides of the debate with sincerely held beliefs. But just because the Labour government got it badly wrong in Iraq doesn’t mean that we should rule out any action at any time in any country. We saw that in Kosovo.

Ultimately, we face a situation where we have to judge whether the costs of inaction outweigh those of playing a role in international efforts to defeat Daesh in Syria. We believe that as a country we should play our part in helping solve the deep-seated problems in that part of the world.

You can read the whole article here.

* Newshound: bringing you the best Lib Dem commentary in print, on air or online.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in LibLink.
Advert

12 Comments

  • Graham Evans 2nd Dec '15 - 6:32pm

    I imagine that most of our remaining supporters in Scotland will now be voting SNP. So much for the fight back!

  • John Barrett 2nd Dec '15 - 6:38pm

    The poll of Liberal Democrat members on Lib-Dem voice showed a clear majority against supporting the Government motion to extend air strikes to Syria.

    Why those Lib-Dem members who oppose air strikes should have to sit back and watch their views be supported by SNP, Labour and some Conservative MP leaves me speechless.

  • Little Jackie Paper 2nd Dec '15 - 6:39pm

    ‘What we have seen in recent months is the emergence of a more coherent international approach towards a diplomatic solution in Syria that involves countries such as Iran and Russia for the first time.’

    Really? This looks like a case-study in the failure of diplomacy. On balance I’m against UK action, but let’s not kid ourselves that there’s a solution on the diplomatic horizon.

  • Caron Lindsay Caron Lindsay 2nd Dec '15 - 6:46pm

    John, for sure, I wish we were opposing this, but Tim Farron’s speech has been one of the best, most confident and compassionate of the debate.

  • Ruth Bright 2nd Dec '15 - 7:04pm

    Caron that is exactly right.

  • Graham Evans 2nd Dec '15 - 7:19pm

    @ Caron Lindsay “Tim Farron’s speech has been one of the best, most confident and compassionate of the debate”. – just not a patch on that of Alex Salmon.

  • @ Caron Very sadly, because I’ve known Tim for a long time and have a great respect and affection for him, I have to say it’s not what people say it’s what people do.

  • If don’t soon start to stake out some principled positions then what prospects for the #fightback?

    If our Party had a claim to anything distinctive in terms of policy it was our opposition to Trident and our opposition to fruitless military escapades in the Middle East. The first was trashed by our conference in September and the second is being trashed by our MPs tonight.

  • Ian:

    “fruitless military escapades in the Middle East”

    So are you against the air action in Iraq? Which (in association with allies, the Iraqi government, the Kurds) has certainly been effective.

  • John Minard 2nd Dec '15 - 8:02pm

    Our enemy’s friend is our arms customer! For me, that’s too muddy a situation to get involved in militarily. One can only hope that if default anti-Isil allies (like Assad) use gas on opponents then we will withdraw immediately.

  • Peter Hayes 2nd Dec '15 - 10:30pm

    So do we take a position where ISIS can have a free hand to murder Christians and the wrong sort of Muslims, and they are not open to negotions, or we do take actions having decided which action will minimise the civilian deaths, whatever that is.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Abrial Jerram
    Jana expectations play a large part in this, if people feel there is a fair route to social mobility that is incentive to engage, and also if one that is widely...
  • nigel hunter
    If an alternative to social media is required more effort should be ploughed into HUGELY expanding youth clubs/provisions. After all they are good meeting place...
  • Tom Reeve
    Thanks Simon. On public net worth: that's the ONS's own Public Sector Net Worth measure, currently negative by around £700 billion, and well over £1.7 tri...
  • nigel hunter
    The implication is that half the Bank of England money is used towards maintaining the establishment and the status quo NOT the growth and development of the c...
  • Chloe
    Paul; This wasn't daubing the outside of Barclays bank with red paint. It was a sustained attack on private property causing over a million pounds in damage - b...