Mark Pack

Mansion Tax: FT praises, Government doesn’t reject

By | Thu 22nd October 2009 - 9:20 am

From Left Foot Forward:

Martin Wolf, writing in yesterday’s FT, has praised the Liberal Democrats “mansion tax” policy:

“Taxation of property should be heavier, not lighter. But it should also be less regressive. That is why the mansion tax is the germ of an excellent idea.

“Taxes on property have other benefits: they automatically rise with prosperity; they are hard to evade; and they are automatically imposed on otherwise untaxed foreign owners. The latter benefit from the amenities of the UK without paying for them. A higher property tax is a simple – and inescapable – way of making them contribute to what they enjoy.”

But unlike a banks supertax, the Government has not yet ruled out a mansion tax. Speaking at a Progress event last night, Liam Byrne told Left Foot Forward:

“On the mansion tax, I’m araid I cannot give you an answer as I haven’t studied it enough.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Dave Page 22nd Oct '09 - 11:48am

    Perhaps ALTER should send Liam Byrne a gratis copy of their new LVT book…

  • Lost LibDem 22nd Oct '09 - 5:43pm

    The Mansion Tax is a bad idea and the Lib Dems have lost my vote in the next general election because of it.

    You have persuasively argued for a Local Income Tax to replace Council Tax (another property tax) only to shoot yourselves in the foot with this!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Simon R
    @Michael: You appear to be questioning my liberalism. But, like it or not, the nature of the Universe is that people have to work because - bluntly, if everyone...
  • Michael BG
    Peter Martin, I do accept that the economy needs people to do paid work to work. However, each individual makes choices and are not therefore forced to pay t...
  • Roger Lake
    This is -- or ought to be!-- amazing! And alarming. So far there are 12 reasoned responses to my title, most of them finding fault with my recommended propos...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Might being sufficiently frightened of the main stream media, to the extent that a political party does not tell reasonable approximations of (socio-economic) t...
  • Geoff Reid
    The usual good sense from Peter Wrigley. The Conservatives and their media cheer leaders cannot get their heads round the possibility of higher taxes helping to...