Mark Pack

Mansion Tax: FT praises, Government doesn’t reject

By | Thu 22nd October 2009 - 9:20 am

From Left Foot Forward:

Martin Wolf, writing in yesterday’s FT, has praised the Liberal Democrats “mansion tax” policy:

“Taxation of property should be heavier, not lighter. But it should also be less regressive. That is why the mansion tax is the germ of an excellent idea.

“Taxes on property have other benefits: they automatically rise with prosperity; they are hard to evade; and they are automatically imposed on otherwise untaxed foreign owners. The latter benefit from the amenities of the UK without paying for them. A higher property tax is a simple – and inescapable – way of making them contribute to what they enjoy.”

But unlike a banks supertax, the Government has not yet ruled out a mansion tax. Speaking at a Progress event last night, Liam Byrne told Left Foot Forward:

“On the mansion tax, I’m araid I cannot give you an answer as I haven’t studied it enough.”

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

  • Dave Page 22nd Oct '09 - 11:48am

    Perhaps ALTER should send Liam Byrne a gratis copy of their new LVT book…

  • Lost LibDem 22nd Oct '09 - 5:43pm

    The Mansion Tax is a bad idea and the Lib Dems have lost my vote in the next general election because of it.

    You have persuasively argued for a Local Income Tax to replace Council Tax (another property tax) only to shoot yourselves in the foot with this!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    A clear, credible, principled strategy from the Yorkists! Makes a welcome change. Sadly, followed by twenty below-the-line posts, providing nearly twenty ve...
  • Simon McGrath
    so we get a permanant increase in costs for these subsidies based on ( alleged ) windfall profits. Its another big increase in spending -how is it to be paid ...
  • Peter Davies
    @Kira CollinsThat assumes we want to help people more with their energy bills than with all the other bills they may be struggling with. There is no reason why ...
  • Rob Heale
    Agree that we need to focus on strategy and have clearer messaging:- 1. We MUST prioritise membership recruitment in all we do, including PPB's, most leaflets...
  • Kira Collins
    Disappointed. The most obvious means of reducing energy bills is to remove VAT. Relatively straightforward to do and does not adversely impact on the attractive...