Mathew on Monday: Why the Lib Dems must be the credible alternative in a chaotic political landscape

The launch of “Your Party” over the weekend – the Jeremy Corbyn/Zarah Sultana-backed left-wing challenger to Labour – was hyped as being a show of unity, clarity, and a bold new politics. Instead, it descended into exactly the sort of chaotic spectacle that leaves most voters even more weary: factional infighting, activists and organisers being banned within hours, claim and counterclaim splashed across social media, and a level of internal turmoil that normally takes years, not mere minutes, to ferment.

For a party that’s mere days old, and that hasn’t contested a single election yet, it was an extraordinary, almost surreal mess.
And that matters – not because “Your Party” is posed to storm the political landscape (it isn’t), but because it reveals something deeper about the current state of British politics. Across the spectrum, there is a hunger for an alternative to a Labour government that – not even eighteen months into office – feels increasingly managerial, defensive, and exhausted far earlier than anyone expected.

There is a desire for something more hopeful, more principled, more genuinely radical than what Sir Keir Starmer’s team have delivered but equally, people want a party that is serious, credible, competent – not another protest movement that collapses into its own contradictions before it has even begun.

That is where the Liberal Democrats must step up. Because Liberalism – real Liberalism – is radical. It is transformative. It is about a meaningful redistribution of power: to communities, to individuals, to those all too often shut out from the decisions that shape their lives.

It is about defending rights and liberties at a time when both of the old parties (and Reform too) seem all too content to trade them away. It is about strong, properly funded public services; a compassionate and workable asylum system; about Rights for all and the defence of minorities; and a forward-looking, internationalist vision for Britain’s place in the world.

But Liberalism is also about responsibility. About rigour. About evidence-based policy making rather than vague slogans and factional purity tests.

And whilst Labour, the Tories, and Reform continue to play out their own dramas – one in government, the Tories still struggling to define what they stand for and Reform failing to move from a ragtag of Right-wing culture war rabble rousers to any kind of credible political force – it falls to us to present a politics that is both ambitious and grounded.
That balance is our unique offer, as a party of the broad Centre.

We can and must be the party of bold ideas and the party of sober competence. We can call for fairer taxes, stronger social care, a greener future, and a humane immigration system whilst also demonstrating exactly how those goals can be delivered. We can champion radical constitutional reform while showing we actually understand how Parliament works.

And, crucially, we can speak to and for voters who want a clear change in direction without wanting to gamble on a movement that can’t even run its own launch event without descending into turmoil or, indeed, turning to the Greens who advocate leaving NATO and somehow having a rental system without landlords.

Your Party’s chaotic debut is not the main story of British politics – but what it symbolises just might be. Voters want something better. Something steadier. Something that is both principled and plausible.

The Liberal Democrats can be that alternative, if we seize the moment!

Reform UK: the party of Tory Retreads

Yet more evidence today that Reform UK is less a “movement for change” and more like a political retirement home for former Conservative politicians – with yet another tranche of ex Tory MPs signing up.

Jonathan Gullis, once the Tory Party’s deputy chair; Lia Nici, former Tory MP for Grimsby; and Chris Green, ex Tory MP for Bolton West; have all defected to Reform.

That brings the total of former Conservative MPs who’ve jumped ship – including high-profile names such as Danny Kruger, Andrea Jenkyns, and Maria Caulfield – to double-figures. So much for Reform’s claim to represent a break from the “same old uni-party” of Labour and the Conservatives.

When its ranks are swelling with Conservative retreads seeking a new ticket, the only thing genuinely changing is the name on the door -not the politics, nor the motivation.

In praise of… Andy Chandler!

This weekend reminded me just how powerful friendship can be. I spent it with my dear friend – and fellow Lib Dem – Andy Chandler, whose kindness, humour, and unwavering support have carried me through more moments than he probably realises.

Politics and political commentary can be exhausting, even overwhelming, but time with Andy is grounding, fun, and joyful. He has that rare gift of making you feel seen, heard, and understood, whether we’re talking policy or putting the world to rights over a cuppa.

In a world that often feels fractious, friendship like mine and Andy’s isn’t just comforting – it’s life-affirming.

* Mathew Hulbert is a former Councillor, is a regular commentator on TV and Radio, and is Co-Host of the Political Frenemies podcast.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

7 Comments

  • Jenny Smith 1st Dec '25 - 8:08pm

    I actually think the Your Party name may yet prove effective for the simple reason that most people I speak to seam to share a disgust with all the political parties just now. The common theme is either that the parties are all the same – offering very similar policies though pretending that they are actually very different – or that they are just in politics for themselves. No political party appears to seek to deliver what the voters want – each party is just trying to persuade voters to pick their particular offering.

    So, I wander if the Your Party name may be a masterstroke. Just by their name, they paint themselves as radically different from all the other parties. Let’s see if they will develop policies that are genuinely reflecting what people want or if they just offer up ideas the party activists believe in.

    Lesson for us – are we genuinely offering policies people want or are we just offering policies our activists believe in but then trying to dress them up in a way to appear more like the things voters actually want?

  • Andy Chandler 1st Dec '25 - 10:10pm

    Thank you for putting me in your opinion piece Mathew!

    I can say with no hesitation that I am so blessed to have earned our friendship. And absolutely right, in a world that has so much friction, tension and conflict its great when you can be in the company of friends. From those quiet, still moments to the more adventurous stuff.

    And since we are starting advent, its good to remind ourselves about those moments of light in the long and still darkness. You are such an amazing friend.

  • Peter Wrigley 2nd Dec '25 - 7:11am

    Thank you Mathew Hulbert for a clear definition of what Liberalism is all about. If only that were the message we are getting across. Yes, at its heart I’m sure that what the electorate really wants is a government that is “legal, decent and honest” (as the Advertising standards authority used to put it; maybe it still does.) But we also want vision. Too often our parliamentarians offer the same petty sniping criticism as the Tories (and of which their current leader gives a master-class) and Labour’s internal dissenters. I’d like to see more of our praising what we like, adding what else we would like to see and amplifying the positive vision of Liberalism which the article summaries

  • paul barker 2nd Dec '25 - 11:59am

    Obviously Your Party are not going to have much in common with us politically but we should be wary of believing the noise in the Media. Actually the YP conference seems to have been broadly successful, everyone knew it would be fractious but surprisingly the members seem to have largely taken control & given the big egos a gentle slap on the wrist. It’s much too soon to guess how well they will do, there is certainly a group of Voters they should appeal to.

    On the broader political landscape, Reform peaked in late September & seem to be in steady decline. I think they have a long way down to go yet.
    The Greens seem to have reached a plateau.

  • Ross O’Kelly 3rd Dec '25 - 6:36pm

    I understand that Your Party want greater democracy, with real power at the grassroots level roots, dealing with concentrations of power. I thought we used to believe in those things, but I guess once you actually start winning things all those good intentions get pushed to one side.

  • Your Party is basically the hard-core hard left of Labour with Benn, livingstone and corbyn and class envy.
    Are lib dems to the left of the Conservatives or even left of Labour? Are they centre or centre left?

  • @ David “Your Party is basically the hard-core hard left of Labour with Benn, livingstone and corbyn and class envy”. Members of ‘Your Party’ ?

    I don’t know how much notice you take of these things, David, but Tony Benn would have been 100 this year if he hadn’t died nearly 12 years ago, and as for ‘class envy’ he was quite posh – his Dad had been a Liberal MP and connected with the Benn firm of publishers. Sadly, Ken Livingstone has been suffering with Alzheimer’s for a few years now, so I doubt if he’s involved.

    That great Liberal, C.P. Scott used to say, opinions are free but facts are sacred.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Ben Wood
    It is such sad news. I was lucky to get to know Micheal over the last few years (working on a book project for the John Stuart Mill Institute). He reaffirmed fo...
  • Ed Sanderson
    Very sad news. I remember many a lively evening of erudite discussion in Leeds - Michael was a true intellect - and a genuinely warm soul. My condolences to his...
  • Jack
    This is bang on. What is the point of a liberal party that won't stand up for rights, especially when both government and opposition want to make hay out of div...
  • Matt (Bristol)
    I totally understand this is a key issue for many Lib Dems (and I'm not speaking for Lib Dems myself, I'm an ex-member). But I don't understand how this 'vangua...
  • John Grout
    Fully agree with all of this. I've seen a few MPs' Pride Month posts reference Section 28 abolition and Same-Sex Marriage - we need to start talking about this...