Via the BBC:
A former donor to the Liberal Democrats is to be tried for fraud in his absence after he skipped bail.
A warrant was issued last month for the arrest of businessman Michael Brown, whose firm gave more than £2m to the Liberal Democrats.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Roz Savage MP writes: Liberalism is having a Moment. But does it have a future? (Roz Savage MP)
-
Reinvigorating the Royal Navy (Ben Edginton-Thomas)
-
Global Power or Euro-Atlantic leader? (Peter Chambers)
-
Lib Dems at the Edinburgh Festival (Caron Lindsay)
-
Diversity, standards, and the treatment of Professor Jason Arday (BLAC Liberal Democrats)
-
Councillor Graham Oakes selected for Bridgwater
-
Reform's foundations of rubbish
-
Burnham Blunders Big Style over planning
-
Gene Chandler: Duke of Earl
-
The freebie culture
-
The Joy of Six 1565
-
The view west from the Stiperstones ridge today
-
Liverpool needs to catch up with London in the fight for clean air
-
A library on the site of an old fire station
Recent Comments
Dan Falchikov
Well said: "David Howarth’s Being Liberal explores the Liberal disposition: open-minded, suspicious of abuses of power, uncomfortable with hierarchy, treatin...
Pawel Urbanski
This is the clearest statement of the case I have read in a while, and "competence is not a destination" is the line worth repeating. One worked example from ...
Simon McGrath
@jennie "“Liberals have always been suspicious of too much power in too few hands.” *looks at direction of travel of internal party mechanisms the last fiv...
Jack Nicholls
Roz, I can't think of anything you ever write that I don't heartily agree with, frequently in letter and always in spirit. We've started (literally just started...
Peter Dunphy
The challenge of empowering local communities/councils etc is not that this will allow the house building or wind farms or railway lines that we need - they wil...
6 Comments
At least he is being described as a “donor to the Liberal Democrats” and not “Liberal Democrat donor”, which is the phrase the Tory spinsters prefer to use.
As per usual though, the headline et al implies that the fraud is something to do with his donation.
For God’s sake GP – show a little contrition?
Personally, I’m more concerned that, at a time when desperate people are being denied legal aid, a convicted fraudster who has skipped bail can get it in absentia.
The thing that worries me the most is the ease with which people with lots of money can use it to buy massive influence with political parties who cannot afford to turn it down – much, much more influence than an individual who works their entire political life for the values they believe in. There are clear examples with all the main parties including the Nats. Equally worrying is when an MP switches late in their career and gets a lordship out of it. Often there is more evidence of personal self interest than a convergence of values. Ultimately though I know which one I would trust.
I’ve never understood this – someone somewhere is throwing money at this in order to run a smear campaign against us…and a very clever one at that!
David, I agree that buying influence is a bad thing, but given the context I think it’s worth stressing that there’s no evidence of Brown having won any influence with his donation.