Michael Mates faces “electoral poll fraud probe” by the police

The Mirror reports:

Former Tory Minister Michael Mates is being probed for alleged electoral fraud over his attempt to become one of David Cameron’s new police commissioners.

The crony of crooked tycoon and Tory donor Asil Nadir, will be grilled by police over claims he broke election laws by giving a false address to win the lucrative post…

It was sparked by a complaint from rival Don Jerrard, an independent “justice and anti-corruption” candidate fighting Mr Mates for the £85,000-a-year role running the Hampshire force.

The former lawyer wrote to the county’s Chief Constable claiming Mr Mates breached the 2006 Fraud Act by giving his address as a house where he rents rooms in Winchester.

But Mr Jarrard claims Mr Mates, 78, and wife Mary were on the electoral role in neighbouring West Sussex, where they have lived for 15 years, until earlier this year.

Mr Mates last night said police had no choice but to investigate but claimed he was the innocent victim of a smear attempt.

Michael Mates, you may recall, was previously the subject of a fine investigative piece by Michael Crick.

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Don’t let the buggers get you down, Mates!

  • RichardwhoactuallylivesinWinchester 9th Nov '12 - 10:23am

    If Mr Mates publishes on the web the relevant address portion of his driving licence, a recent bank statement, a recent credit card bill and vehicle registration document then we will see where he thinks he lives…

  • Charles Beaumont 9th Nov '12 - 4:58pm

    This demonstrates the problem with the PCC elections. There’s so little public engagement with the whole thing that the usual scrutiny that keeps politicians broadly on the straight and narrow isn’t being applied. How many more ‘Mates’ are out there?

  • What happens if Mates is elected on 15 November & then is subsequently found guilty of electoral fraud?

  • Peter Chegwyn 12th Nov '12 - 12:37am

    He gets disqualified!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Martin
    Andy Burnham does seem to have a knack of choosing constituencies which don't have a railway station -at least not for their major town. Neither Ashton-in-Maker...
  • John Kelly
    @Tom Arms – good article but I must take issue with you on the following paragraph: “Except for the occasional exchange of fire, fighting between Hamas and...
  • Jana
    @Peter Wrigley “ the maximum amount of individual freedom that doesn’t infringe the freedom others.” With due respect, I regard that as a libertarian ...
  • David Ford
    I have a 'better' record than the man in Cirencester: never elected anyone in a FPTP election since 1970 (despite Eric Lubbock getting 43% then). But I have al...
  • David S
    The goal of a representative electoral system is not to ensure that this or that party gets elected. The goal should to be to ensure that every voter, or as clo...