Mark Pack

Michael Mates faces “electoral poll fraud probe” by the police

By | Fri 9th November 2012 - 8:50 am

The Mirror reports:

Former Tory Minister Michael Mates is being probed for alleged electoral fraud over his attempt to become one of David Cameron’s new police commissioners.

The crony of crooked tycoon and Tory donor Asil Nadir, will be grilled by police over claims he broke election laws by giving a false address to win the lucrative post…

It was sparked by a complaint from rival Don Jerrard, an independent “justice and anti-corruption” candidate fighting Mr Mates for the £85,000-a-year role running the Hampshire force.

The former lawyer wrote to the county’s Chief Constable claiming Mr Mates breached the 2006 Fraud Act by giving his address as a house where he rents rooms in Winchester.

But Mr Jarrard claims Mr Mates, 78, and wife Mary were on the electoral role in neighbouring West Sussex, where they have lived for 15 years, until earlier this year.

Mr Mates last night said police had no choice but to investigate but claimed he was the innocent victim of a smear attempt.

Michael Mates, you may recall, was previously the subject of a fine investigative piece by Michael Crick.

* Mark Pack is a member of the Federal Board and editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire. He is a candidate for Party President.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Election law and News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Alistair 9th Nov '12 - 10:14am

    Don’t let the buggers get you down, Mates!

  • RichardwhoactuallylivesinWinchester 9th Nov '12 - 10:23am

    If Mr Mates publishes on the web the relevant address portion of his driving licence, a recent bank statement, a recent credit card bill and vehicle registration document then we will see where he thinks he lives…

  • Charles Beaumont 9th Nov '12 - 4:58pm

    This demonstrates the problem with the PCC elections. There’s so little public engagement with the whole thing that the usual scrutiny that keeps politicians broadly on the straight and narrow isn’t being applied. How many more ‘Mates’ are out there?

  • Andy 11th Nov '12 - 1:08pm

    What happens if Mates is elected on 15 November & then is subsequently found guilty of electoral fraud?

  • Peter Chegwyn 12th Nov '12 - 12:37am

    He gets disqualified!

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDavid Raw 18th Jan - 3:42pm
    Five candidates and one without parliamentary experience ? It's getting like the Swiss Navy. Lots of admirals and no ships.
  • User AvatarBrollachan 18th Jan - 3:39pm
    Terrible idea. For starters, it gives Ed Davey either an advantage, or hurts his campaign, depending on how well we do. We're also treading water...
  • User AvatarAndy Hinton 18th Jan - 3:09pm
    Seems like a pretty sensible move to me. A contest right now would be obscured by the Labour contest, this way we stand a chance...
  • User AvatarJeff 18th Jan - 3:03pm
    Ian 18th Jan '20 - 1:29pm: ...the economic case for austerity is believed by no-one nowadays. The EU believed it and still do. ‘Austerity has...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 18th Jan - 3:01pm
    @ Joseph Bourke, "Socialism grounded in Marxist theory relies on the Labour theory of value holding that the value of goods or services are solely...
  • User AvatarAlison Crawford 18th Jan - 2:59pm
    I too agree with David Evershed. We really need to revolutionise our communications system to make it less frustrating for the troops on the ground.