Monday: politicians and bankers learn their possible fates

A quirk of the political calendar means Monday sees both politicians and bankers learn of their possible future fate. For English MPs it is when they get embargoed copies of the Parliamentary Boundary Commission’s draft proposals, which get published on Tuesday. Monday is also the day when the Vickers Commission publishes its banking reform recommendations.

There is a widespread expectation in Whitehall that the Vickers Commission will recommend isolating retail banking from other banking activities, but without demanding that companies be split up. Internal firewalls and the like will be demanded instead.

It is also widely expected that the Vickers Commission will not demand its proposals are implemented promptly, either recommending more measured implementation or by staying a little vague on the matter. Arguments against rapid implementation that people have made include both the technical complexity of introducing changes and the hotly contested question of what the impact of rapid implementation might be on the economy. As the Financial Times has argued, it is not that hard to side-step the economic issue, making it “a poor reason to delay”.

But unless Vickers demands prompt implementation, the combination of the technical issues and the pressure from the banks means that implementation is likely to be pencilled in for several years away. That will present the government with a tricky political problem: how do you make a genuine intention to introduce a change in the future sound credibly different from a deliberate attempt to kick reform into the long grass? Perhaps Vince Cable at the height of his popularity would have been able to get away with a “trust me, I really mean it” approach but given the strength of public feeling on the matter (though not a strength of feeling that has actually motivated many people to switch their own bank accounts) that would be unlikely to work at the moment.

So it means the government is probably going to go for legislation as that would give much more substance to promises that change will indeed be coming. Moreover, the politics of this could turn out quite nicely. There is very strong pressure from parts of the financial system to minimise reform. Putting legislation through Parliament will see the Parliamentary pressure coming overwhelmingly in the opposite direction – for bigger, faster reform – providing the government with political support to see off the lobbying push. Indeed, we may well see the that the ironic outcome of the pressure from large parts of the banking sector to delay reform is to end up producing reform in which they have far less say than if it had been quicker and without Parliamentary legislation.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • Daniel Henry 11th Sep '11 - 9:57am
  • Yeah, right. The bankers are quaking. That’s why RBS and Lloyds shared are UP today despite the banking implosion on the continent due to imminent Greek default. The markets have it sussed : this report is pure hogwash. 8 years to do … something. And we all now that our Tory chums will whittle the limited proposals away to nothing.

    If Vince wants to resign then let him. The Vickers report is pathetic in its scope and doomed to never be implemented in the least. You couldn’t make it up.

  • Paul McKeown 12th Sep '11 - 10:18pm

    Things look grim in the Eurozone. Faced with the current chaos in the Eurozone, would it not make sense to get underway with Vickers, tout de suite? If there are going to be defaults, haircuts or other dramatic events in the Eurozone, is the British taxpayer going to have to stump up again for the resultant losses incurred by its banks?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Roger Lake
    I do mean something! I believe I have already drafted, checked, and sent a reply to this question. So I wonder where that is now. Briefly, I tried to exp...
  • Rif Winfield
    The level of UBI. Clearly this will need to be set initially at the threshold for paying the basic rate of tax, i.e. at £12,570 - or rather at whatever the thr...
  • Roger Lake
    I am shocked by all this noise. No-one seems to be actively looking ahead and working towards the General Election c.2029, when I refuse to be so pessimistic ...
  • Martin
    <iPeople on very low incomes in quite demanding jobs with long hours pay tax for public services which are not percieved to be at a very high standard. ...
  • James Fowler
    The problem with the 4 day week policy for public servants is not such what it may or may not achieve as how it looks. People on very low incomes in quite deman...