More on mobile phones and polling

Last week, Mark Pack explained the impact that mobile phones have polling.

 

[… T]his year’s Presidential election [… shows] phone pollsters who include mobiles regularly finding a higher level of support for Barack Obama than those who ignore mobiles. The difference in support between these two approaches is large enough to matter in a close election: Obama’s lead is around four percentage points higher when mobile phone only households are included.

As polling day closes in on us, the gap has widened – with some pollsters as many as 13% ahead for Obama when they include cell phone users.  The explanation? Nate Silver at stats blog fivethirtyeight.com says

I did a radio hit the other afternoon with Mark DeCamillo of California’s vaunted Field Poll, which does include cellphones in their samples. He suggested to me that it was much easier to get the cooperation of cellphone users on the weekend than during the week. How come? Because most cellphone plans include free weekend minutes. Conversely, one might expect that young people are particularly difficult to reach on their landlines over the weekend, since they tend to be away from home more (especially on a weekend when some nontrivial number of them are out volunteering for Obama). So, while I haven’t tried to verify this, it wouldn’t surprise me if the “cellphone gap” expands over the weekend, and contracts during the week.

Read the rest of the article – and see the amazing graph – here.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in LDVUSA and Polls.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    The case for higher taxes is blatantly clear, unless you are a politician seeking votes. Everything in Britain - the NHS, the courts, the prisons, defence, and...
  • FS People
    @ Mick Taylor “The whole thrust of our complex and bewildering tax code IS to protect the rich. ” But it is not. We actually tax high earners more as a pr...
  • FS People
    The defences of the triple lock are just bizarre. @Mick Taylor “You propose making that worse by stopping uprating pensions.” That is not what was sai...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    I agree that capacity is the problem, but I think we might be fixing the wrong end of it first. Right now thousands of affordable homes are going up under pl...
  • Jana
    My memory of being brought up in a council house was that ordinary working people lived in council houses and wealthy people lived in private houses. Today, the...