New “Policy Pitch” opportunity hits conference

imageA new format hit conference yesterday. At the end of Saturday’s session, we had a “Policy Pitch” section. This is a new idea whereby members submit ideas to the conference commitee and three of those ideas are accepted for discussion at the conference.

The chosen members gave a short speech outlining their policy proposal. Then they sat down in a comfy chair on stage with three “assessors”, who were: Julie Smith, Jeremy Hargreaves and Willie Rennie. There was then a little interviewing of each proposer from the three assessors.

The three policy pitches yesterday were:

  • Elaine Bagshaw – An education system that teaches to ability, not age.
  • Glanville Williams – All Public Bodies should, as part of their annual reporting on workforce monitoring, conduct and report on ‘selection rate’ and ‘availability rate’ comparison tests in terms of the visible ‘protected characteristics’, (gender, disability and race).
  • Catherine Smart – Divide the Border Agency and make the section dealing with Asylum Seekers an Agency of the Foreign Office, leaving the rest with the Home Office.
  • At the end of the session there was a show of hands as to which representatives thought each proposal was worth working on to move forward. Catherine’s asylum seekers proposal received slightly more hands of approval than the other pitches. However, all three proposals were excellent, very well presented and well-received.

    Well done Elaine, Glanville and Catherine for making your superb pitches.

    And a special mention goes to Glanville Williams who is attending his first conference and is a new member. Welcome, Glanville!

    * Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist. He is one of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

One Comment

  • Robert Wootton 21st Sep '15 - 7:01pm

    The education system should indeed teach according to ability and not age . The teaching profession should examine the methodology of”The Flipped Classroom, leading onto the Flipped Mastery technique. This would, I believe, be a more efective way of teaching subjects and stretch the pupils and the teachers abilities.

    When such a methodology of teaching is established, it would make the fining of parents who take their children during term time unnecessary. That particular law could be repealed since lessons would be available 24/7/365 online..

    Now for some creative thinking! Since technology can now do anything that can be precisely specified, I specify this scenario.

    Pupils carry a smart card. On the card is listed electronically the GCSE subjects the pupil wants to take. Once a month or once per term, the pupil enters the examination hall at the school. The pupil inserts their card into a machine and enters his student/pupil number. On a screen is displayed the GCSE subjects the pupil wants to take. The pupil selects the examination subject he/she wants to take and whether it is a “mock” or actual.

    The machine then prints out an examination paper with questions taken from a database of the examination board. Copy is sent also to the subject teacher and the examination marker

    This means that a hall full of pupils taking an examination could be taking different subjects and those taking the same subject would have different questions from each other.

    When the examination is over, the pupil or the invigilator puts their examination paper into the scanning part of the machine and is sent electronically to the examiner and the pupils subject teacher.

    Perhaps model answers could also be sent to the examiner and subject teacher.

    These machines do not exist but they could be built. The Self Organising Learning Environment; S.O.L.E. has been in existence for ten years at least so this machine is possible.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Lorenzo Cherin
    David You are correct, so with Starmer, because, You are right about good councils decisions Starmer is right if the government did not cut the coun...
  • David Evans
    Lorenzo, I always find it mildly amusing how some Lib Dems seem to be forced to believe that a Labour politician is somehow more correct than a fellow Lib D...
  • Katharine Pindar
    Daniel, thank you for your approval of the Beveridge-2 /Social Contract plan. I don't disagree that UBI, if it ever comes about, could be part of it, and my col...
  • Chris Cory
    @ Paul Barker. General expert economic opinion is that the economy is in recovery mode, although clearly the success of the vacine program and the speed with ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Paul, It won't quite be "all over" by Easter, which is the beginning of April, but if we can get 25 -30 million doses of vaccine administered by then, whic...