New “Policy Pitch” opportunity hits conference

imageA new format hit conference yesterday. At the end of Saturday’s session, we had a “Policy Pitch” section. This is a new idea whereby members submit ideas to the conference commitee and three of those ideas are accepted for discussion at the conference.

The chosen members gave a short speech outlining their policy proposal. Then they sat down in a comfy chair on stage with three “assessors”, who were: Julie Smith, Jeremy Hargreaves and Willie Rennie. There was then a little interviewing of each proposer from the three assessors.

The three policy pitches yesterday were:

  • Elaine Bagshaw – An education system that teaches to ability, not age.
  • Glanville Williams – All Public Bodies should, as part of their annual reporting on workforce monitoring, conduct and report on ‘selection rate’ and ‘availability rate’ comparison tests in terms of the visible ‘protected characteristics’, (gender, disability and race).
  • Catherine Smart – Divide the Border Agency and make the section dealing with Asylum Seekers an Agency of the Foreign Office, leaving the rest with the Home Office.
  • At the end of the session there was a show of hands as to which representatives thought each proposal was worth working on to move forward. Catherine’s asylum seekers proposal received slightly more hands of approval than the other pitches. However, all three proposals were excellent, very well presented and well-received.

    Well done Elaine, Glanville and Catherine for making your superb pitches.

    And a special mention goes to Glanville Williams who is attending his first conference and is a new member. Welcome, Glanville!

    * Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Conference.
Advert

One Comment

  • Robert Wootton 21st Sep '15 - 7:01pm

    The education system should indeed teach according to ability and not age . The teaching profession should examine the methodology of”The Flipped Classroom, leading onto the Flipped Mastery technique. This would, I believe, be a more efective way of teaching subjects and stretch the pupils and the teachers abilities.

    When such a methodology of teaching is established, it would make the fining of parents who take their children during term time unnecessary. That particular law could be repealed since lessons would be available 24/7/365 online..

    Now for some creative thinking! Since technology can now do anything that can be precisely specified, I specify this scenario.

    Pupils carry a smart card. On the card is listed electronically the GCSE subjects the pupil wants to take. Once a month or once per term, the pupil enters the examination hall at the school. The pupil inserts their card into a machine and enters his student/pupil number. On a screen is displayed the GCSE subjects the pupil wants to take. The pupil selects the examination subject he/she wants to take and whether it is a “mock” or actual.

    The machine then prints out an examination paper with questions taken from a database of the examination board. Copy is sent also to the subject teacher and the examination marker

    This means that a hall full of pupils taking an examination could be taking different subjects and those taking the same subject would have different questions from each other.

    When the examination is over, the pupil or the invigilator puts their examination paper into the scanning part of the machine and is sent electronically to the examiner and the pupils subject teacher.

    Perhaps model answers could also be sent to the examiner and subject teacher.

    These machines do not exist but they could be built. The Self Organising Learning Environment; S.O.L.E. has been in existence for ten years at least so this machine is possible.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • Geoff Reid
    The Tories will come back wherever they decide to anchor themselves politically. What happens to Labour is perhaps more unpredictable. They had internal problem...
  • David Symonds
    It will be interesting to see what happens in this Parliament. Starmerism appears to be a variation of the old Labour govt from 1974-9 which includes corporate ...
  • Chris Cory
    Surprised you don’t know a lot of people in the party? It’s a national political party with 60-100,000 members (who knows the real figure) not the local go...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Chris Moore, The Tories and Reform don't have to formally unite. They simply do what the Labour Party and Lib Dems have started to do. ie Have a non-aggres...
  • Nom de Plume
    I think for a party like the LibDems, in the UK, with the present demographic, under FPTP, the ceiling is about 100MPs. That is, if London does not get fed up w...