New TV broadcast: Clegg lays blame on Government and bankers

We spy on the LibDem YouTube channel the party’s Queen’s Speech Broadcast, which airs tonight (17.55 on BBC2, 18.55 on ITV1).

But you don’t need to wait for it to materialise on your telly box because here it is:

Read more by .
This entry was posted in Lib Dem TV and News.
Advert

6 Comments

  • David Morton 5th Dec '08 - 1:03pm

    Not bad though as a piec of communication I’m not sure the thre themes will hang together.

    1. It’s an introduction video. tis is the excellent bit. In effect acknowledge that no one knows who Nick is and make a virtue of it. The conversational style and “ordinary” folk are as god a way of doing it as any.

    2. The sweep of history introduction made we wonder if we were going to get some analysis of why we were in this mes but i should have known better!

    3. Good that there was only one policy pledge as we need to find a single message. I’m just not convined that a very vague to “big, permanent” tax cuts without saying whoes or how thy’ll be paid for will gt us very far.

    On the theartics. I tought the setting was very confused. It confused two motifs.

    1. ” The Kitchen Table.” if they wanted this they should have used one and done it in a domestic setting. As it was the fact that nick and public were sat on either side of a physical barrier looked od.

    2. ” the informal chat/down the pub”. if they wanted this why not have sofas easy chairs/ and get him out of the suit and tie.

    As it was it loked like they were trying to do both aproaches at once without achieving either. I did like the cockney ryhming slang references to bankers though. people will get that.

  • Matthew Huntbach 9th Dec '08 - 11:06pm

    Oh, was that it? Well, if it was better than Labour’s, Labour’s must have been dire.

    Look, what people want is the message that we’re in control and understand this stuff. Instead, what do we get – prat in a suit asks people what they think (thinks “he’s a prat in a suit, he hasn’t got a clue”) – and says “tax cuts, jolly good, let’s have lots and lots of them, and, er, well there’s probably some loophole we can find somewhere to pay for it”. Is there, I wasn’t convinced, were the punters? No, I doubt it.

    What we could have had – LibDems and Liberals in the past warning about what would happen, and proposing solutions. The solutions need to sound clever. There must be some archive clips (or were we cheering along the Ponzi scheme economy all the time as well?).

    LibDems that look and sound like ordinary people. Sorry, Nick can’t help the way he looks and sounds, but he comes across as just another of these government and banking people he’s trying to blame – one of them, not one of us.

    Fire and passion – Nick gave every impression he was trying very badly but failing to summon it up.

    Confidence – Nick just did not come across as confident, one just did not get the impression this was someone who knew what he was doing and had the answers.

    Teamwork – Kennedy was a lazy b****** who left a lot of the work to others, and do you know what – it worked. People realised the LibDems weren’t a one-man band, they had plenty of good people at the top who would make plausible ministers. When the country is cheering on Vince Cable, not to make use of him here is, er, jealousy?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarRob Parsons 24th Jun - 5:24pm
    I'm in tune with the basic premiss that we should look for co-operation where it is possible and where we believe it will benefit us....
  • User AvatarMichael BG 24th Jun - 5:07pm
    @ TonyH If we assume that Brexit will be bad economically for the UK (and I think we both do), we have been a failure...
  • User AvatarJames 24th Jun - 4:55pm
    If we'd not had a deal with the Greens in Richmond, yes they wouldn't have won any seats, but we wouldn't have won 43 instead...
  • User AvatarPaul Pettinger 24th Jun - 4:16pm
    Organising with the Greens prob made the difference in two seats for us last June and, if we worked better with them, a bigger impact...
  • User AvatarSteve m 24th Jun - 4:01pm
    From the experience of the county elections up here where we tried to broker a deal only to have them go back on it. We...
  • User AvatarOnceALibDem 24th Jun - 3:56pm
    OMG - I can't believe this doesn't have a mention of Tim Farron who has actually made a new train service in his constituency. Given...