Nick Clegg stops Theresa May’s £3000 immigration bond

nick cleggWay back in March, in a speech that, to say the least, was not well received in the party, Nick Clegg proposed that some people visiting Britain from “high risk” countries should pay a bond. He said:

One idea, which appeals to me, is a system of security bonds. And so I’ve asked the Home Office to do some work on it with a view to running a pilot before the end of the year.

The basic premise is simple: in certain cases, when a visa applicant is coming from a high risk country, in addition to satisfying the normal criteria, UKBA would be able to request a deposit – a kind of cash guarantee. Once the visitor leaves Britain, the bond will be repaid. Clearly, we need to look into the detail and seek a wide range of views, including from the Home Affairs Select Committee.

The bonds would need to be well-targeted – so that they don’t unfairly discriminate against particular groups. The amounts would need to be proportionate – we mustn’t penalise legitimate visa applicants who will struggle to get hold of the money. Visiting Britain to celebrate a family birth, or a relative’s graduation, or wedding should not become entirely dependant on your ability to pay the security bond.

And I would want a system that is welcomed by legitimate visitors rather than place a great burden on them. Done right, this would speed up the application process, giving UKBA greater confidence about people’s intentions, allowing them to make better, faster decisions.

At the time, it’s fair to say that I was less than impressed with this idea. At leat, though, I recognise that Nick was at least trying to make it easier for people to get into the country for a specific event. It was an alternative to a months-long appeals process which might mean that people would miss the event anyway. However, Theresa May decided to introduce a much more draconian version of it, a £3000 charge for everyone. This was about as close to Nick’s original idea as your average lettuce leaf is to an onion.

It’s hardly surprising, then, that Nick has put his foot down and blocked May’s plans, as the BBC reports.

A Home Office spokesman confirmed a Sunday Times report that the policy would be scrapped.

The decision is thought to have been taken after deputy prime minister Nick Clegg threatened to block it.

The BBC report contains Vince Cable’s criticism of the idea, too.

Let’s hope that this intervention by Nick Clegg, coupled with the scaling back of Tory plans to make landlords responsible for checking people’s immigration status and the scrapping of the awful Go Home poster vans is a sign of a more robust approach to Theresa May’s Home Office now that Norman Baker is ensconced there as Minister. While I remain uncomfortable with most, if not all, of the Immigration Bill going through Parliament, I recognise that Liberal Democrats are holding the Tories back in the policy areas where the two parties are a million miles apart in approach and policy.

 

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Tony Dawson 3rd Nov '13 - 10:39am

    I, too, am delighted at the removal of this bureaucratic nightmare. But it is unfortunate that some form of ‘voluntary bond’ is not being left as an option, with the bond being (a) substantial and (b) put up by the host. A considerable number of prospective visitors to these shores are denied visas at the moment purely because they are considered by UKBA/Home Office to be too poor to be a ‘good bet’ to return to their homeland without force. This precludes an awful lot of wedding guests, people who have provided hospitality to UK travellers abroad etc.

  • Tony, while I can appreciate your idea of voluntary bond, but in practice, I fear that it would basically be mandatory due to the draconian way it would be administered. The Home Office would basically say you can apply without it, but if you do, we are 99.9% likely to reject you – and the 0.01% we accept must be super rich, anyway.

    This would basically exacerbate the horrific de facto dichotomy that we have in this country where those wishing to come here – or have friends come here – to visit are split into two groups based purely on their economic variability.

  • Bravo Nick Clegg! (not so often I write that).

    I hope the scaling back of landlords responsibility to be immigration officials will be total. It is the wrong road to follow!

  • “Well I can’t spot the difference between what Nick Clegg proposed and what he rejected. Perhaps someone can explain ? Surely its not that Nick thought the bond was a good idea at £1000 but bad at £3000 ?”

    They could hardly put out an article entitled “Nick Clegg stops Nick Clegg’s immigration bond” now, could they?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarGlenn 21st May - 8:09am
    The very wise Romans? You mean the vicious militaristic expansionist empire that enslaved people, loved to force some of them to kill each other for...
  • User Avatarfrankie 21st May - 8:01am
    Martin, Peter isn't a Conservative he is a Reactionary, he wishes to return to a previous time. It is in fact a defining trait of...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 21st May - 8:01am
    @ Envelope "The point I am making is you have to make things crystal clear – got it ?" Which of course Asquith did via...
  • User Avatarexpats 21st May - 7:11am
    [email protected] envelop “The very wise Romans said if you want peace prepare for war. We ignored that before 1914…….” May I suggest that "If you...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 21st May - 6:12am
    @ Martin, You seemed to be trapped in your own fixed mindset that the EU is a marvellously progressive, (even slightly socialist?) , entity and,...
  • User AvatarMichael BG 21st May - 12:44am
    Joseph, I note you didn’t address my point that you think wages for public sector workers should increase but you don’t think the real term...