Nick on paternity leave, Lib Dem poll ratings, and Lembit and Brian

There’s an in-depth interview with Nick Clegg in today’s Telegraph – here’s a few highlights:

On his imminent fatherhood and paternity leave

Evangelical about the importance of parental leave, Mr Clegg and his party recently adopted a radical child care policy which would allow new fathers as much as nine months or more off work.

He himself plans to spend every minute of the current official entitlement away from the political vortex when the time comes … Wouldn’t an election spell the end of his plans to take proper paternity leave: the full two weeks off “wiping and cooing” as he puts it?

“Proper?” he splutters. “It’s only two weeks. It should be more. … We’re all agreed that one of the great crises in this country for children, particularly for boys, is a lack or absence of positive male role models. And we’ve got legislation that says you can take two weeks off when the baby’s barely aware of your existence. That’s not good enough.” Lib Dem policy is for parents to be given up to 19 months leave, split between the mother and the father; but could the leader of a political party really take months and months off?

“No, it would be really difficult for me,” Mr Clegg says, “But the problem is that no one feels entitled.

“I’m not going to be sanctimonious about this; people should make their own decisions. “I just feel that if dads don’t get involved with their kids early on in a meaningful way often they don’t remain engaged afterwards. I personally think two weeks is a pathetic amount of parenting.”

On the Lib Dems’ popularity

“Of course I’d like to be further ahead,” he admits. “As history tells us, when people are anxious about putting food on the table, a tank of petrol, paying their heating bills, people gravitate towards either the government of the day or to the loudest alternative. There’s a great risk we’re going to be really squeezed and I think we’ve confounded expectations massively by not being squeezed in the polls.

“Of course I’d like to have wall to wall coverage of Lib Dem economic policy. Of course I’m frustrated, but I think we’ve made the right judgements, we’re on the side of the vast majority of the British people who need help. Am I frustrated that we don’t get more recognition? Yes I am, but the last thing I do is pull my hair out about it. I am lucky enough to have become leader of a party which I genuinely think has got the best people in frontline positions, certainly the best ideas, and crucially is growing incredibly fast.”

On the celebrity of Lembit Opik and Brian Paddick

Mr Clegg admits he has spoken to both about their behaviour – and claims to be relaxed at their failure to take his advice. So, would he allow the Daily Sport [for which Lembit recently accepted the job of political columnist] into his home?

“No, I wouldn’t,” he says. “Am I uneasy about it? Yes. Do I think Lembit’s walking a tightrope? Yes I do. Equally, Lembit has a presence in parts of the public political debate that frankly very few politicians do. Does that incur risks? It does. The positive side of it is that you’re reaching people with a message they might not otherwise hear. The downside is clearly that you are either made to look as if … you’re sanctioning things that don’t reflect your views at all.

“I certainly wouldn’t go on I’m a Celebrity or stand in a tropical pool. Of course I wouldn’t. I’ve spoken to both of them. Neither of them have positions of national authority in my party. I lead a political party; I don’t lead a military operation. We are a liberal party in spirit and in name. There’s a long tradition of fairly eccentric individuals.”

Read more by or more about , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

10 Comments

  • Liam Pennington 7th Jan '09 - 3:34pm

    “Neither of them have positions of national authority in my party. I lead a political party; I don’t lead a military operation. We are a liberal party in spirit and in name. There’s a long tradition of fairly eccentric individuals.””

    No, sorry, that’s quite enough.

    Consider my membership of this party ended from this reply alone.

  • David Allen 7th Jan '09 - 5:16pm

    Liam,

    Speaking as someone who is just as angry about the right-wing populism as you are – I don’t think that this interview is in itself a good reason to walk out.

    What would you have preferred Nick to say? I can’t actually tell whether you think he should have said (A) “I’m going to come down hard on these guys for their appalling misbehaviour” or, alternatively, whether he should have said (B) “I have no problems at all with what Lembit and Brian have done.” Could you at least please tell us which of these opposite extremes represents your views?

    I think he had to steer carefully between these two extremes, and he did it adequately well. Option (A) would have had everyone saying “who the hell are you, little Hitler?”, while option (B) would have earned the response “Clearly the Lib Dems are all just one big laugh”.

  • I called Nick Clegg before I went on ‘I’m a Celebrity…’ and he made no comment or judgement on my decision. I have not spoken to him since I came out (of the jungle!)

  • The Telegraph wrote:
    “Mr Clegg admits he has spoken to both about their behaviour – and claims to be relaxed at their failure to take his advice.”

    Brian wrote:
    “I called Nick Clegg before I went on ‘I’m a Celebrity…’ and he made no comment or judgement on my decision. I have not spoken to him since I came out (of the jungle!)”

    Hmmm.

    Mind you, the concept of Nick “GQ Magazine” Clegg speaking to his colleagues about “their behaviour” with regard to media issues at least has the merit of humour about it …

  • David Morton 8th Jan '09 - 6:09am

    ” Eccentric” ” walking a tight rope “. You don’t need to be Bletchley Park to break that Code.

  • I really appreciate all your comments. Thank you.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 26th Jan - 8:25am
    Doesn't the problem of democracy in the US go back even further than Reagan? I understand Eisenhower, who by tradition, should have given his 'Military-Industrial...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 26th Jan - 3:41am
    Very talented artist - I was a big fan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jta56wBl7SM
  • User AvatarJohn Marriott 25th Jan - 11:38pm
    Given some of the comments about Dr Lee I wonder why he is bothering. We hear much about spiteful Tories and brutal Labour. It would...
  • User AvatarHugh 25th Jan - 10:36pm
    As someone who has had to stand on trains from the Midlands to London I agree more capacity is needed. But, HS2 in its present...
  • User AvatarInnocent Bystander 25th Jan - 9:51pm
    I didn't understand. What would the LibDem Lords support have to do with the business case? That's arithmetic not politics and it's someone else's money...
  • User AvatarDavid Raw 25th Jan - 9:37pm
    @ David Evershed "The increasing estimates of the cost of HS2 and the reducing estimates of the benefits mean there is no busines case for...