With nuclear in the news today, readers might be interested in this statement from Steve Webb.
The Lib Dems also have an email list to keep people informed about our anti-nuclear campaigns.
And don’t forget our screensaver – available here.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
The Climate Clock Is Ticking: Reflections from the International Seminar on Culture and Climate Change at Somerset House last Friday (Christian de Vartavan)
-
The state we’re in – musings from a new young member (Dennis Delice)
-
Can “Manchesterism” work for our rural communities? (Ray Georgeson)
-
What would Keynes do? (Charlie Larkin)
-
Why Britain should be wary of Andy Burnham’s Devolution Revolution (Iain Donaldson)
-
Sign up here to get Scottish Liberal Democrats news via email
-
Tastes change ~
-
Nine in ten paying more than necessary in Vehicle Excise Duty
-
A radical agenda but can Burnham deliver?
-
Reg Calvert and his boarding school of rock
-
A shocking abuse of the legal system where the rich try to bully the weak and poor into submission
-
The Joy of Six 1540
-
Are we doing enough to insure against climate change?
Recent Comments
Cassie
Well put. 'Have grace and listen to each other' would make a wonderful slogan everywhere, by the way....
Peter Davies
or both. We could also add new town corporations. The current "new towns" use a different model from those that delivered the likes of Milton Keynes. As far as ...
Dennis Delice
Thanks for reading, your feedback means a lot to me! I had a level of trepidation about how it would be read and come across, but I thought it was important to ...
Chris Cory
Excellent. Beyond excellent. Your understanding of the shortcomings of identity politics and emphasis on reinvigorating democracy represents a new and much ne...
Alice
Great article!...
One Comment
One cheer I think for the government’s decision to support a new programme of nuclear power stations. One cheer only because the decision is long overdue. One cheer only because it is still not clear how nuclear electricity will be paid for. Though cheaper than all but the best onshore wind, nuclear remains more expensive than fossil stations. If the price of carbon is low, nuclear will still not be economic: if high the promoters will make embarrassingly large profits.
The problem with the party’s anti-nuclear stance is that it is illogical: a dangerous attribute for any party seeking government. If we are serious about global warming we must take every oportunity to reduce CO2 emissions. We do not have the luxury to pick and choose. Worse, our opposition is based on false premises. On any objective grounds nuclear is safe, clean and relatively inexpensive. The problems of long term storage are political not technical. There is no reason why nuclear should push out wind and other renewables or delay efficiency drives: we need everything. If we want to be seriously treated as a potential government we must get back into the real world.