Selling weapons to Israel is a breach of international law.
This is not my opinion. It is the judgement of 600 British legal eagles, including three former members of the UK Supreme Court. They have been joined by 130 parliamentarians and the three main Opposition parties have demanded a debate on the issue.
It is also the verdict of the governments of Canada, the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Japan and Spain. They have all suspended arms shipments to Israel.
All the above agree that Israel is breaking a number of international laws with its attacks on civilians in Gaza. Furthermore, that countries that supply the Israeli government with weapons are complicit in breaking those laws.
So what laws is Israel breaching? To start with there is Article 7 of the UN Arms Trade Treaty which “prohibits the export of arms where is an overriding risk that the weapons can be used to commit serious violations of international humanitarian law.”
It is an international law which has been enforced by Britain in the past. In 2019 the British Court of Appeals used it to suspend arms sales to Saudi Arabia based on the Saudis indiscriminate bombing of Yemen.
There is also the 1948 Geneva Convention Against Genocide, which, ironically, was enacted as a response to the killing of 6 million Jews in the Nazi Holocaust. This convention prohibits “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group.” It goes on to describe the prohibited acts: “causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group and deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the group as a whole.”
The Israeli government and their supporters say that claims that they are breaching international law are “nonsense.” But, so far the Israeli Defence Force has caused the death of more than 33,000 Palestinians in Gaza and seriously injured 52,000 more. Eighty-five percent – 1.9 million people have had their homes destroyed by Israeli bombs. Gaza’s hospitals are medical rubble. Israel’s refusal to allow food and water into Gaza have created famine conditions. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said that Gazans are “the highest number of people facing catastrophic hunger ever recorded.”
On Thursday, President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had what press officers euphemistically call “a full and frank” telephone conversation. The president demanded an “immediate ceasefire” and that Netanyahu take “specific, concrete and measurable” steps to ease civilian suffering and protect aid workers.
The telephone call was immediately followed by a Brussels press conference by Secretary of State Antony Blinken who said: “If we do not see the changes we need to see, there will be changes in our policy.” This not-so cryptic comment was interpreted as meaning limitations on how US weapons are used. The United States provides $4.1 billion in military aid to Israel which represents 69 percent of Israel’s foreign-bought military needs. Germany is second with about 25 percent.
The final impetus for the American threats and the British calls for a suspension of arms sales, was the killing on Monday of seven Western aid workers—a Pole, a US-Canadian, three Brits, an Australian and a Palestinian driver. All seven were from World Central Kitchen (WCK) which had been distributing food. They had just picked up 100 tons of food aid when all three vehicles in which they were travelling were hit by Israeli missiles within four minutes of each other. Each vehicle had the WCK logo emblazoned on its roof.
Initially the Israelis said the deaths were a “tragic mistake.” Netanyahu added: “This happens in war.” But an amazingly fast IDF investigation announced on Friday that the deaths were the result of a failure to follow the IDF’s own rules of engagement. As a result a Colonel and Major have been fired and three other officers have been reprimanded. The IDF said further action may be taken against the officers.
The deaths of the WCK workers brings to over 200 the number of aid workers who have died trying to keep Gazan civilians alive. As a result of the latest deaths, a number of aid organisations have pulled out of Gaza. They cannot risk their workers’ lives. WCK has suspended its operations so has the American Near East Refugee Aid. Since October, WCK has served 43,000 meals. It was one of the biggest food aid operations in Gaza. Their withdrawal lends credence to the claim that Israel is weaponising famine which could be construed as “deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to bring about the destruction of the group as a whole.”
* Tom Arms is foreign editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and author of “The Encyclopaedia of the Cold War” and “America Made in Britain". To subscribe to his email alerts on world affairs click here.
8 Comments
Why is our party only prepared to talk about ending arms sales? When Russia invaded Ukraine we didn’t just stop selling them things that could be used in making weapons, we banned virtually all trade, travel and investment. Israel has already killed more civilians than Russia, despite the much smaller population than Ukraine and may very well end up killing several times that number.
Why the double standard?
We should ban Israel arms sales but apparently like all the countries that have accepted the international legal and moral requirement to do so, we don’t actually sell them anything significant. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-68737412
Banning arms sales to Israel until the hostilities in Gaza cease seems the least we can do under the circumstances. Too many people have died and the area has become totally destroyed since its invasion by Israel. Surely the remaining destruction of Hamas as a military force can be performed peacefully by imposing curfews and other restrictions while slowly rebuilding it.
Although the UK is not a major supplier of weapons to Israel, refusing to supply them would give a diplomatic and moral statement far out of proportion to the withdrawal of the actual military aid…
Regarding the deaths of aid workers, Israel’s explanation leaves more questions than it answers..If this incident was due to those ‘on the ground’ not following instructions, how many other times has this happened (without an explanation)..The attack on the Médecins Sans Frontières convoy for example?
I read somewhere that President Eisenhower stopped all money and arms to Israel to stop the 6 day war ( maybe another). As a soldier he thought like a soldier and not a politician. Surely this is what President Biden should have done right at the beginning.
It looks like Russia will win the war in Ukraine and Iran the war in Gaza.
@Brian Sinfield
You’re thinking of the 1956 Suez crisis I think.
Eisenhower was US president from 1953-1961. He was not president in 1967. Lyndon Johnson was president in 1967 (took over from his vice president role after the Kennedy assassination) – as you could have found out easily.
“Although the UK is not a major supplier of weapons to Israel, refusing to supply them would give a diplomatic and moral statement far out of proportion to the withdrawal of the actual military aid…”
Couldn’t agree more. A generation ago, the predominantly white UK took action against the white apartheid regime in South Africa. Cutting sporting links turned out to be far more practically effective than might have been expected. It showed the apartheid leaders how isolated they were, and helped persuade them to make a sensible peace deal with Nelson Mandela.
This generation should take similar action, this time making a military rather than a sporting gesture. Sometimes, gesture politics is what works. Just as with South Africa, we are now dealing with religious zealots with an excessive belief in their own rectitude and a blind spot for their obligations to their neighbours. Changing the mindset won’t be easy. But F W deKlerk managed it.