Observations of an ex pat…Trumps immigration battle plan

Thank you Melania. Thank you Ivanka. Thank you also Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary for Homeland Security. Thank you for engineering a reversal of the inhumane policy that tore 2,842 children away from their immigrant parents.

No thanks for President Trump, Attorney General Jeff Sessions, White House Chief of Staff John Kelly or shadowy prince of darkness Stephen Miller. They were responsible for the heartless decree that turned vulnerable children into pawns in the president’s immigration battle.

The separation decree was in the making for well over a year.  John Kelly first publicly proposed it in May 2017.  Stephen Miller took up the baton with a vengeance. He has taken over from Steve Bannon as the ultra-nationalist, alt-right, anti-immigrant chief White House strategist with the ear of the president.

Miller has been whispering away: Immigration, immigration, immigration. That is the key to victory in the mid-term elections.

For President Trump immigration means Congressional funding for his “big beautiful wall”, laws to allow the speedy deportation of illegal immigrants and sweeping changes to legal immigration.  He is increasingly frustrated that that Congress has refused to cave in to his demands, especially as illegal immigration figures are climbing after a drop in 2017

In May the president launched a vicious and lengthy tirade against Homeland Security Chief Ms Nielsen in front of the entire cabinet. She, he said, was to blame for the rising immigration figures. Ms Nielsen sat there and took it on the chin, but according to sources, was close to quitting on the spot. She is reported to hate her job.

The much-maligned Attorney General Sessions saw an opportunity to weasel his way back into the presidential good books. On May 7th he told wannabe immigrants: “If you cross the border unlawfully then we will prosecute you…. If you are smuggling a child you then that child may be separated from you as required by law.”

For six weeks Ms Nielsen, Ivanka, and Melania said nothing. Possibly because they thought that such a policy was so cruel and inhumane that it would never make it past the threat stage. They, were, of course, wrong, and on June 17th Ms Nielsen broke administration ranks and tweeted. “We do not have a policy of separating families at the border. Period.”

First Lady Melanie then waded in with her statement: “We need to be a country that follows all laws but we also need to be a country that governs with a heart.” At the same time, first daughter Ivanka was whispering in her father’s other ear that he was making a big mistake.

The result, was the presidential order reversing the attorney general’s separation order.  It was significant that the two officials at the signing ceremony were Ms Nielsen and Vice President Mike Pence. Conspicuous by their absence were Stephen Miller, Jeff Sessions and John Kelly.

But the war is far from over. In fact, the pro-immigration lobby may have achieved only a pyrrhic victory.

Melania, Ivanka, the mainstream media and an international chorus of dissent may have forced a change on one part of Trump’s immigration strategy, but their opposition has moved the issue back to the top of the American political agenda—which is exactly where Trump wants it.

Donald Trump needs to keep his support base mobilised, activated and energised in order to retain control of Congress in the mid-term elections. Momentum at the moment is with the Democrats. The prize of a victory in November and the possible impeachment of Trump has driven them to win by-elections in Virginia, and Pennsylvania.

A get-tough immigration policy is the number one issue for the Trump base. It is what put him in the White House. Fifty-five percent of Republicans supported his family separation policy. Ninety-one percent of Democrats and 68 percent of independents opposed it. Trump recently warned the Democrats in a tweet that if the mid-terms are fought on the immigration issue they will lose. He may be right.

* Journalist Tom Arms is vice-chairman and secretary of Tooting Liberal Democrats and a regular contributor to Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.

One Comment

  • Did no one else realise that Melania T’s “I don’t give a monkeys'” coat back was probably referring to the recent revelations of Ms Stormy Daniels?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael BG 10th Jul - 2:10am
    William Wallace, You mention a social contract. How do you feel about the concept of a new Beveridge-type Social Contract which Katharine Pindar and I...
  • User AvatarRoland 9th Jul - 11:00pm
    I suspect "active citizenship" isn't that dissimilar to what David Selbourne wrote about in his book "The Principle of Duty: An Essay on the Foundations...
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 9th Jul - 10:52pm
    Thanks so much for this discussion everyone. My Dad would have been one hundred years old today. I wish we could have sorted this one...
  • User AvatarJoe Bourke 9th Jul - 10:46pm
    Innocent bystander, I am a little more optimistic for the future. When I lived in the States in the 1980s there was great concern that...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 9th Jul - 10:18pm
    David Raw, this what Peter Sloman of New College, Oxford tells us https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/251445/Sloman%202015%20Contemporary%20British%20History.pdf: ...she married Sir Rhys Williams, a South Wales lawyer, coalowner, and Coalition...
  • User AvatarWilliam Wallace 9th Jul - 10:01pm
    The concept of active citizenship isn't simple or easy, either. What responsibilities does a citizen have to fellow citizens, society and state, in return for...