OECD tax data: updated, still surprising

Back in December last year I blogged about how tax hasn’t changed over time, quoting the Mirrlees review:

Despite some predictions to the contrary, countries are not being forced inexorably to tax less in an increasingly globalized and competitive world economy. Between 1975 and 2008, taxes rose as a proportion of national income in virtually every OECD country. On average, the tax take rose from 29.4% to 34.8% of national income. In no OECD country was there a significant fall in the tax take over this period…

Within the total tax take, we might expect that governments would find it more difficult to raise taxes from internationally mobile companies and people. In fact, revenue from corporation taxes has more than held up over the past 40 years—corporate income taxes accounted for 9% of tax revenues across the OECD in 1965, 8% in 1985, and 10% in 2008.

HM Treasury logoThe OECD’s data now runs up to 2010 (with the 2010 figures provisional) and it continues the same trend. When I last blogged, I said it might surprise people that total taxes had not been driven downwards. On reflection, it is perhaps just as surprising, if not more surprising, that the total tax take hasn’t risen either – after all, so much of the rhetoric over the last decade and more in the UK has been about tax rises, stealth taxes and the like.

What particular people say has varied as Chancellors have come and gone and the parties in power have changed, but the overall message from politicians, interest groups and the public has so consistently been about extra taxes and too much tax that you could be forgiven for thinking taxation overall is up.

Yet this is what the figures show the total tax revenue as a percentage of GDP to have been in the UK:

1985 37.0%
1995 34.0%
2000 36.3%
2005 35.7%
2010 35.0%

For some other OECD data that runs counter to widely voiced assumptions, see how employee protection in the UK compares with other countries.

* Mark Pack is Party President and is the editor of Liberal Democrat Newswire.

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

3 Comments

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jonathan Parry
    This is an interesting article. One Nation Toryism never got going until the demise of the Liberals in the 1920s (Disraeli certainly never practised it). To t...
  • Peter Davies
    In Latin it may be a gerund but in English it's a noun. If I were to object to the Government's referending of the public, that would be a gerund....
  • Alex Macfie
    Except that "referendum" is not a Latin 2nd Declension Neuter noun. It's a gerundive; as such it is used in English differently from Latin so should take an Eng...
  • PM
    @ PM, It can be either. I do remember from my schooldays that the plural in Latin involved replacing the 'um' of a neuter noun by an 'a'. I must have managed...
  • Alex Macfie
    It's "referendums"....