Opinion: Growth has returned, but what does it reveal?

One of the few tactically savvy moves made by the coalition recently has been its muted response to UK economy’s return to growth. This article examines what the return to growth means for the wider economy.

The first point to make is that, just as the double-dip phase of the recession was caused by international events, the return to growth has similarly been caused by external factors. The coalition deserves neither blame for the double-dip, nor credit for its ending.

Many of those who oppose the coalition’s economic policies on political rather than economic grounds question the validity of the statistics. This is a mendacious argument as those same people were content to rely on the same stats to justify their criticism of the government when the stats endorsed their world view.

The second argument, used by Labour, is that the ‘fundamentals’ of the economy remain weak.

A major economic fundamental is the level of employment, which is at a record high. And while a substantial number of these jobs are part time, they are providing enough hours and income to make it worthwhile for the person to work rather than be on benefits. The employment numbers should also been seen in the context of the government’s policy of reassessing people who have been registered as unable to work due to illness. Many of these people have been moved to Job Seekers Allowance, yet even then the numbers claiming has fallen.

A second fundamental is inflation. This continues to be above target, indicating that demand is constant as inflation cannot rise if demand maintains a persistent long term fall. Others argue that this is the result of a temporary stimulus caused by the Olympics. But all stimuli are temporary by definition, and stimulus is exactly what critics of the coalition have been calling for, ignoring the stimulus which Gordon Brown oversaw and that the Olympics was a scheduled stimulus.

While the Olympics undoubtedly played its part on the demand side of the economy, events in the Eurozone played just as significant a role on the supply side.

ECB President Mario Draghi’s announcement in July that the central bank were prepared to buy eurozone debt in ‘unlimited quantities’ in order to preserve the single currency  put a floor on the euro crisis. This allowed the markets to ‘price in’ the risk of a default and stimulated more economic activity, the overspill of which has benefitted Britain .

To maximise the positive impact of a stimulus, the initial spurt of demand must feed through the rest of the economy to create further demand. This is called the multiplier.

If inflation is too high the multiplier will be lower because the value of the original increased demand will be eroded as costs rise.

The demand side priority must be to maintain the current fiscal policy, and be more concerned about inflation than growth, as long as the latter remains in positive territory. The medium term outlook is for inflation to rise, as outlined here.

But Liberal Democrats must be firm in fighting the biggest threat  – Tory hardliners repeating the mistakes of Thatcherism in treating a return to growth as the chance to pursue reckless tax cuts and vanity spending.

That may be the toughest challenge of all.

* David Thorpe was the Liberal Democrat Prospective Parliamentary Candidate for East Ham in the 2015 General Election

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • mike cobley 7th Nov '12 - 2:19pm

    Returning to growth, eh? That’ll be the green shoots of recovery, then, which you need a magnifying glass and delusionary mindset to see. Oh, unless we’re talking about bonuses in the City and financial fantasists paying each other in exotic derivatives in which case put out the flags, hire the bands, and trebles all round!

  • Richard Dean 7th Nov '12 - 5:48pm

    The SECOND graph in the following link is very interesting. It indicates that European NGDP has been growing from 2009Q1 to 2011Q1. So does this latest news mean that the UK is two years behind Europe? What does that say about the scale of our financial incompetence?

    Do you know whether the information provided here is correct or not? The link originally appeared in an article by Bill le Breton who used a different graph from the same article to argue a different, apparently incorrect point.

  • David Pollard 7th Nov '12 - 6:52pm

    Inflation is stubbornly high because of oil and food prices. The worry is that the world economic growth is very poor. When the world economy picks up, the oil price will go through the roof (try $250/barrel). The US is diversifying their oil supplies with shale oil and if that is successful that may limit the price of oil. The main thing the LibDems can do is continue with the shift to renewables at a steady pace.
    And by the way, both private and public debt is still very high and the economy will not grow very much until some of that debt overhang has been worked off.

  • mickle cobley 8th Nov '12 - 12:38pm

    @ mike cobley employment is the city has been reduced by5 since 2010-fresh job cuts seem to be announced daily-you dotn need a micrscope to see the impact of the return to groweth as unemployment falls etc.
    @ richard dean-NGDP is a different figure from GDP-but ‘europe’ is an inprecise term-does it mean the EU or europe as a whole-is russia included-is ukraine are the oil rich cauaus nations etc?

  • david thorpe 8th Nov '12 - 12:49pm

    @’ mike

    the last tiem the phrase green shoots of recoveryw as used-by norman lamont-it proved to be accurate-its not a phrase I would use at this stage-its to early to tell as theter are too many external factors-but where we are now is employment falling demand steady and growth returning-that isnt a bad start .
    @ richard dean
    how is that graph defining europe-theif russia and the causucus countries are included then that would mean very high growth

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPeter Martin 5th Jul - 4:06pm
    @ Paul Barker, In principle nothing needs a referendum. Not even a constitutional matter. But if you think you see Tory and Labour MPs voting...
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 5th Jul - 3:21pm
    I would add * make technology, digital, work for green
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 5th Jul - 3:18pm
    Stop belly aching. No good just shouting "the government didn't do this or that. Just say what we would do, loudly and long
  • User AvatarPaul Barker 5th Jul - 3:16pm
    The "Agreement" between Us & Labour in 1997 was entirely done on the basis of nods & winks & was simply about not targetting each...
  • User AvatarMax Wilkinson 5th Jul - 3:11pm
    Thank you to everybody who has replied. I appreciate you all taking the time. Some, including Nick and James, have spoken about the need to...
  • User AvatarAntony Watts 5th Jul - 3:11pm
    OK so climate is ZERO by 2040. Sorry but we need more than (or less than) ZERO to get us out of the mud. We...