Opinion: Really Facing the Future

Really Facing the Future has just been published on the Liberator website.

We have written it as an alternative to the Liberal Democrats’ policy development agenda, Facing the Future (PDF): this was published in August 2011, and intended to set out the party’s values, highlight the main challenges and summarise policy development priorities for the remainder of the current parliament – it will be debated at party conference this coming Monday morning.

We believe that Facing the Future fails to face the future. It lacks political imagination, it lacks a coherent analysis of the challenges we face and it lacks passion, seeming to have been approached as a dry academic exercise.

Our alternative, Really Facing the Future, sets out ten new directions for policy. They are not exhaustive or definitive. They represent the views of two Liberal Democrats (albeit with 68 years of membership between them). But they are an attempt to encourage Liberal Democrat policy makers to think more radically – partly because the challenges that lie ahead require more radical thinking and partly as an antidote to the idea that party policy is at its most effective when it tentatively suggests a few tiny changes that don’t threaten the status quo.

If the Liberal Democrats want to face the future, they must look at the real world as it is – not as it seems from the peculiar prism of Westminster – and respond. That is what Really Facing the Future tries to do.

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

2 Comments

  • Well, I’ve not read the whole thing, I’m a tiny bit worried about the idea of conflating ideology and values/principles, but I’ll see how this all goes! (for me principles are the end goal and ideology is ignoring evidence in favour of a particular way of attaining it)

  • Okay, that concern wasn’t warranted in the text itself. A few oversimplifications (I don’t think that you can characterise the 80s onwards as purely being Britain becoming a less fair and equal society in its entirety – the early New Labour years would constitute a slight bucking of the trend) and sometimes I wanted more content (for instance in the section on macroeconomics I was left a bit unclear as to your exact position), but not too bad at all.

    A tiny bit concerned at what I see as support for free schools in one section (which have actually not been performing well in Sweden recently).

    Otherwise very, very good. Particularly the sections on Europe and the ageing economy.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...
  • Peter Martin
    @Iain, "Without financial autonomy, political devolution is incomplete......." The problem, from a macroeconomic perspective, is that full finan...
  • Gordon Lishman
    When I wrote 5.1 in the Constitution, my over-riding intention was to ensure that the mass Party had some rights in relation to overall strategy, which was an i...
  • Roland
    @nick Baird - “ or whether it was just a terrible mistake caused by a lack of attention and professionalism by the officers involved.” I think this is th...
  • David Murray
    Typo: I first joined the Liberal Party in November 1966, almost 60 years ago this year !...