Opinion: “Sit down, shut up” now acceptable in Scotland’s political arena

scotland_fansI’m no football expert, but the chant “Sit down, Shut up” seems to be popular as a chant to silence a loosing team. In a similar fashion the cry ‘no mandate’ has taken a similar position in Scotland’s political arena. This was most recently seen in the Edinburgh instalment of Question Time, when both Angus McNeil MP and Lesley Riddoch argued that if a party has no elected officials in the country then its members have no right to express their opinions.

Regardless of your stance in the independence debate (though I think it would be heavily weighted to one side in this particular forum) or how you feel about Nigel Farage and George Galloway (I expect this to be just as heavily weighted also), it is impossible to ignore the effect of these tactics, which amount to an attack on free speech.

Freedom of speech is a right protected by the European Convention on Human Rights: ‘Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by Public Authority’. I wouldn’t suggest that, as it stands, the Scottish Government is in breach of the ECHR, but to put down a speaker on the grounds they have no elected officials in Scotland undermines this principle which is fundamental in any democratic society. Free speech is of particular importance in the run up to next year’s referendum, where a forum in which all feel free to discuss and contribute is of paramount importance.

The only purpose of such an argument is to shut down and undermine a contributor to a debate. It is an attempt to rule out valid contributions to the debate in hand. That elected representatives are getting away with using such a tactic is totally unacceptable.

As a result, a view that it is socially acceptable to shout down appoint or minority views has developed, where Nigel Farage was forced to take refuge in a pub in Edinburgh and again in Aberdeen where he was treated with hostility. It is more than possible to respect someone’s right to speech and to disagree with that which he says and believes.

A democracy without free speech is no democracy at all; a Scotland in which free speech is shouted down is unacceptable. It is the collective responsibility of everyone, especially those in positions of power and responsibility, to protect Human Rights – to protect free speech in Scotland.

* David Evans is a Lib Dem member in Aberdeenshire East

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • I don’t think Galloway or Farage should’ve been on Question Time without a LD member, especially when we have nearly as many MSPs than Respect have elected councillors.

  • Al McIntosh 9th Jul '13 - 3:25pm

    What is an attack on free speech is including parties on question time that are irrelevant in Scotland and not including the Greens or Liberal Democrats which have far more claim to be relevant. It is also an attack on free speech to assert that Angus McNeil and Lesley Riddoch do not have the right to make that point.

    This is just another example of pro-UKIP and anti-Scottish bias we have had from the BBC lately.

  • Question Time is hopeless. Needs a reboot to bring it into the 21st century.

  • This is silly. Is my right to free speech impinged because I haven’t been invited on Question Time? The right to free speech does not imply a right to a publicly funded platform. The BBC does have a duty under it’s charter to present a range of political opinion roughly representative of the population. There may well be a debate to be had about whether the time given to Farage and others is proportionate or not but it is not a debate about free speech. No one has suggested that Farage should not be free to speak, publish, and broadcast his views and opinions.

  • David Evans 10th Jul '13 - 1:45am

    My point is not about QT, it’s on people’s right to their opinion and to vocalise it. I don’t disagree that Galoway and Farage’s inclusion was for the publicity either. I disagree with the general acceptance in Scotland of shouting down minority views, QT was an example of something most will have seen that highlights what’s happening in Scotland in general

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarAlex Macfie 23rd Sep - 8:59am
    Glenn: The people who "already think it" are mostly people who are not going to vote Lib Dem anyway. And the fact that it's been...
  • User AvatarGeoff Reid 23rd Sep - 8:52am
    Bloody predictive text: ....a misleading notion ...remainers....but by!
  • User AvatarGeoff Reid 23rd Sep - 8:46am
    It seems ridiculous to have to say it, but after various bits of nonsense in the weekend media people need reminding that Article 50 only...
  • User AvatarGlenn 23rd Sep - 7:53am
    Alex Macfie It's not a case of taking lectures or lessons. The attacks will stick, because a lot of people already think it and it...
  • User AvatarGeoff Payne 23rd Sep - 7:44am
    This is a great idea. The number of really high quality cards we get from people who have obviously taken time and trouble to write...
  • User AvatarGlenn 23rd Sep - 7:25am
    Frankie I'm too busy being "a bit exotic" in my small little village of Birmingham to indulge you.
Thu 10th Oct 2019