Opinion: My marriage will be different, but equal, my Lords and Ladies…

wedding ringsIt has been said that people who vote against the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill will be ‘standing on the wrong side of history’ – as those of us who know and study history accept, only time will tell.  But yesterday, as we led the Equal Marriage Vigil outside the House of Lords  I was struck that we were witnessing and perhaps even making history.

What occurred at our Vigil can be variously described as glorious, fashionable, tuneful and positive. In short we gathered together the LGBT+ communities and their families – and we sang, we danced – led by the London Gay Men’s Chorus.

The serious side was there too; many members of the House of Lords – hearing the singing in their Chamber – came out, joined us and discussed it with us.    I was especially stuck and pleased at how many members of the Cross-benches came out and listened (and I noticed a couple of them even dancing along) and shared what was evident: that this Marriage Bill is a positive bill.

The Lords will vote tonight – it may be won, it may be lost – but what I now know is that the argument has now been won; the only issue is whether the Lords support the Bill tonight.  If they don’t then I fear the results will be devastating for them and their reputation and the full crushing of public opinion will be brought to bear.

The short-hand for this Bill is that it will begin to breakdown the persecution and marginalisation, it will stand up for persecuted minorities and the world is watching.  But individual peers will make their own choices and decide whether to vote for equality.  I do not want sameness, as has been suggested, I do want the right to marry. Given the chance I will be seeking to take full advantage of that law.  But I don’t want sameness.

My obsession with genealogy is considerable – I have box upon box of history and heritage.  Sadly it is unlikely that the churches of my forebears will bless my union if asked – but my family, my friends, the communities in which I live and work will know and can celebrate with us at our wedding.

This I tell you will be a happy and joyous event, but it will not be the same as other marriages.  Believe me when I say that my marriage will be different to that of my Catholic forebears who struggled to bring up their family at all during the Irish Potato Famine knowing that most of their children would die in childhood. My marriage will be different to my great-great-grandparents’ military marriage as he travelled the Empire fighting for Queen and County. I am determined it will be different to the loveless marriage of my great-grandparents where drink and food-on-the-table were dominant features.  I hope it might be more like the marriage of my parents – companionship, love, affection, support, shared endeavour.  Perhaps even like the marriage of my best friend where I have the honour of adding value to their relationships as a god-parent to their children.  My (our) marriage will be different but equal.

When I sat in a pub in Stoke-on-Trent and told a close friend  I was in a relationship with a man, little did I think that 16 years later Joan Walmsley, the first person I ever told about my relationship,  would be voting on whether we could bring that relationship together as a marriage.  I hope her noble lords and ladies join her in the content Lobby tonight; I have Joan on a list and it’s a prospective wedding guest list.  Please, my Lords and Ladies, allow me to send that invitation to print.

* Ed Fordham is a party member and activist in Chesterfield, Derbyshire.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarPaul Barker 11th Aug - 7:29am
    I dont see much point in comparing present Polling with the past, we are not in "Normal" times. Current Politics does have something of a...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Aug - 7:22am
    @ Michael BG, You're just saying that: (S-I) + (M-X) + (T-G) =0, Which is the well known sectoral balance equation. But what makes you...
  • User AvatarPeter Martin 11th Aug - 5:20am
    Vince Cable isn't too keen on the idea of a UBI. He says: "My scepticism was fuelled by seeing it advocated with equal fervour both...
  • User AvatarPaul Holmes 11th Aug - 12:27am
    @Marco. The point is though that when we were on 0-6% at the start of Paddy's Leadership it was an unusually low and quite temporary...
  • User AvatarJoseph Bourke 11th Aug - 12:03am
    John Marriott, Canada conducted a UBI trial in the 1970s called Mincome as described in this article https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200624-canadas-forgotten-universal-basic-income-experiment "... for basic income to work on...
  • User Avatarsuzanne fletcher 10th Aug - 11:13pm
    Yes good stuff, after the faff of getting in to watch it. Hope plenty of people do bother though