Opinion: We made Mental Health an issue – now we must lead the fight to make it possible

Having worked as a frontline mental health social worker for the past 15 years, there was no-one prouder than I was to see Nick Clegg and Norman Lamb push mental health care (and its place within the NHS) up the political agenda .

There is no doubt that without the determination of our gutsy Party, we would not have seen, over the course of the General Election, the other political parties try to associate themselves with our work: securing more funding for mental health care (particularly child and adolescent mental health care) over the last Parliament.

But as any social work student worth their salt will tell you, Maslow developed his hierarchy of needs for a reason.  Mental health doesn’t just happen.  We need to have our physiological needs met; we need to be safe; we need love and belonging and esteem before we can be ‘self-actualised’ – before we can have the psychological strength and resilience to maintain decent mental health, for most of the time.

There are many brave members of the party who have spoken out about their own experience of mental illness over the past months and years.  Mental illness can be a reality for anyone – whatever their background.  As we know, one in four of us will experience mental illness in our lifetime.

But it is also true that there is a link between poverty, social exclusion and mental illness.  Just as there is a link between poverty and substance misuse; and substance misuse and mental illness; just as there is a link between experience of the care system, homelessness, substance misuse and mental illness.  Just as there is, too often, a link between leaving care, experience of the prison system, homelessness and substance misuse.  You get the point I am trying to make?

In writing about his own liberalism Norman Lamb wrote recently: ‘I want Liberal Democrats to lead the way in giving those suffering from mental ill health and those with learning disabilities and autism the right to make meaningful decisions about their care and support – to take control, not to be treated as second class citizens.’  And he is right (although may I say that there are already many,  many fantastic colleagues who spend their professional lives trying to make this happen).

But all rights are indivisible are they not?  Haven’t we started to campaign against the Conservatives plans to abolish the Human Rights Act for exactly this reason?

I admire Norman’s commitment to excellent, person-centred mental health care in this country.  But the reason I am campaigning for Tim Farron to be our next leader is that I know it is his plan for a more Liberal Britain that will deliver better mental health for our citizens.  Tackling poverty;  delivering fairness; tackling the housing crisis; embedding skills; focusing on quality of life – facilitating ‘self-actualisation’.

Yes, mental illness is an equalities issue.  Yes we must tackle discrimination and the stigma that is still endemic in our society.  But if Liberal Democrats want to deliver better mental health in and for this country, we had better start talking more about social justice, social inclusion, and social and economic rights.

* Nick Perry is an approved mental health professional and was the parliamentary candidate for Hastings & Rye at the General Election.

Read more by or more about , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Sammy O'Neill 1st Jun '15 - 11:48pm

    I agree entirely with most of this article, but was disappointed to see it then turn into an advert for one of the leadership candidates.

    Regarding the debate about mental health, I have never understood why parties don’t make more of a point about the economic benefits of long term investment in helping those suffering from conditions to remain in employment/education (where possible) so they remain contributing taxpayers as opposed to being forced to rely on welfare/require additional support. I have, from a ruthlessly pragmatic perspective, always seen investment in mental health as an incredibly valuable way of ultimately reducing state expenditure in the long run through taking a more preventative/mitigating approach.

    Arguably this kind of thinking would play well in tory/liberal battlegrounds and might strike a few chords with those blue leaning voters who are put off by the thought of increased government spending.

  • CllrJoJones 2nd Jun '15 - 3:20pm

    In light of the demise of Charles Kennedy, under the Mental Health umbrella we need to highlight the issues surrounding addictions [such as to alcohol] and the impact they have on those around the person with the disease.
    Alcoholics need help & recognition. Education is vital to de-stigmatising & understanding the problems.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Chris Moore
    Mick, our record at holding by-elections in the current political generation, i.e. last 25 years, has been distorted by the wipe out in 2015, at which point we ...
  • Mick Taylor
    I reject emphatically the idea that Corbyn was as toxic for Labour as militant. He actually did quite well in 2017 and only started doing badly when the entire ...
  • Mick Taylor
    @Roger Billins. I was 12 when the Liberals won Orpington and helped with the campaign. Eric held the seat for 8 years and then lost it in the disastrous electio...
  • John Marriott
    @David Raw Thanks for thinking of me. I’ve been on a bit of a self imposed sabbatical from LDV, which looks like being permanent. I think I’ve ruffled too ...
  • Tristan Ward
    @Paul Barker "everyone is running down the Solid Labour win in Wakefield" Seems about right to me: 12.75 % compared to our 30% swing 39% turnout (be...