Paddington Bear for ethics adviser after Geidt goes?

Wendy Chamberlain was being ironic last night when she said the only person who would now take on the job of ethic adviser to Boris Johnson’s government would be Paddington.

Last night, Lord Geidt’s resignation was a bit of a mystery. It was known that he was unhappy in his role because of the antics of the prime minister, Boris Johnson, who is his boss. Geidt had an uncomfortable session on Tuesday when he told the public administration and constitutional affairs committee it was reasonable to suggest the prime minister may have breached the ministerial code when he was fined during the Partygate scandal.

Today, we have the full correspondence between Lord Geidt and Boris Johnson. In his resignation letter, Geidt said he was being asked to judge on Johnson’s intention to risk a “purposeful and deliberate breach of the ministerial code” and he was not prepared to do that.

If Boris Johnson had ever thought he could divert attention from his own flummery onto the pressing problems facing the UK and the world, he has failed big time. Geidt’s resignation further diminishes Johnson’s credibility and moral authority, though it is hard to see how it can fall any further.

Geidt told Johnson he was left in an “impossible and odious position” and he told Mr Johnson that he could “have no part in the matter”.

We don’t know the full details of the request to Geidt, though in the modern tradition of colander government, it perhaps won’t be long before we learn everything in detail.

Geidt said:

“The idea that a Prime Minister might to any degree be in the business of deliberately breaching his own Code is an affront. A deliberate breach, or even an intention to do so, would be to suspend the provisions of the Code to suit a political end. This would make a mockery not only of respect for the Code but licence the suspension of its provisions in governing the conduct of Her Majesty’s Ministers. I can have no part in this.”

The response from Johnson said the dispute involves the Trade Remedies Authority. Politico suggests that this relates to tariffs on steel.

Accusing Johnson of not responding to the criticism in Sue Gray’s report about his lack of adherence to the Nolan Principles, particularly on leadership, Geidt said he had believed that it was possible to continue credibly as Independent Adviser, “albeit by a very small margin”. But, he continued:

“The idea that a Prime Minister might to any degree be in the business of deliberately breaching his own Code is an affront. A deliberate breach, or even an intention to do so, would be to suspend the provisions of the Code to suit a political end.”

* Andy Boddington is a Lib Dem councillor in Shropshire. He blogs at He is Thursday editor of Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Kevin Hawkins 16th Jun '22 - 4:23pm

    An honourable, law-abiding, decent Prime Minister is perfectly capable of working out for themselves what is ethical behaviour and what is not. Why on earth does the PM need an Ethics Advisor?
    Oh, sorry, I’ve just remembered who currently occupies No.10 and have answered my own question.

  • Graham Jeffs 16th Jun '22 - 4:59pm

    Poor Paddington!!

  • Having an ‘Ethics Advisor’ at No.1o is like having a ‘clean up your dog’s mess’ sign; those who ‘clean up’ don’t need a sign and those who don’t just ignore it..

  • Nick Collins 17th Jun '22 - 1:39pm

    I think Johnson would rather give the job to Winnie The Pooh; he’d much prefer a bear of very little brain.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Suzanne Fletcher
    I started by being very pleased about this article, that it is being said, and Ed has done it well. However when I got to the 3 main recommendations there was ...
  • Peter Martin
    @ Cassie, I suppose you could argue that we quit our previous job without knowing what the terms and conditions would be of any new one. Or maybe that we end...
  • Richard David Denton
  • Richard David Denton
    Well done Richard Foord for your sewerage amendment .... puta squeeze on the water com;panies take them back into public ownership. PUT THAT IN THE LIB DEM MAN...
  • Nigel Jones
    Mick, you are right to say there is anti-semitism in UK. The Labour and Lib-dem parties now do tackle it, but I stand by the quote in my first comment by Beinha...