Paddy: Tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia “a far greater danger” than ISIL

Paddy Ashdown has told the Independent that the growing tension between Saudi Arabia and Iran in the wake of the Saudi executions carried out over the weekend is “a far greater danger” than ISIL. He said that the UK Government should be robust about calling the Saudis out for their actions:

Lord Ashdown said Saudi Arabia’s sudden mass execution of prisoners – including the prominent Shia cleric Sheikh Nimr al-Nimr and a number of young political protesters – may have been intended to derail the ongoing Syrian peace talks in Vienna.

These executions are deeply, deeply destabilising to the very delicate situation that exists in the Middle East and the danger of a wider Sunni and Shia conflict. The West, including the UK government, is only just realising the danger of this and its implications for long term peace in the region. It poses a far greater danger in the long term than, for example, Isil,” the former Lib Dem leader added.

The UK Government should be making it explicitly clear that it regards this act as extremely destabilising. These executions are shocking in human rights terms and reveal the real nature of the people with whom we are dealing. The UK’s stance underlines its deeply illogical position of ignoring the funding of jihadist groups, including Isil, which is coming from within Saudi Arabia.

In the same article, Ming Campbell, while still critical of the Saudi actions said that he thought we shouldn’t be going out of our way to alienate either Saudi Arabia or Iran as we needed both of them onside against ISIL:

However, former Lib Dem leader Lord (Menzies) Campbell said that he believed the Government’s current approach to Saudi Arabia was correct. “The Saudi Arabian government is well aware of UK opposition to capital punishment as indeed are the Iranians who also practise it. There is no reason why we should not repeat that opposition as often as is necessary to do so,” he said.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

6 Comments

  • Tim over the weekend , Paddy and Ming here , are all three correct , though I do not agree with Ming on the government, which is seen to be too cosy with Saudi Arabia ,yet it is essential we maintain dialogue . Having said that it has delivered little . Prisons , human rights commissions , a peculiar cosiness for sure , yet Britain cannot impress upon the Saudi s to release RAIF BADAWI !Instead , AN OUTRAGE !!!!!MASS EXECUTIONS !

  • BY THE WAY CAN SOMEONE SAY WHETHER ANYTHING IS HAPPENING RE RAIF BADAWI , A LIBERAL HERO ?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Delivers OIL? perhaps a good case to get on with Fracking and extraction of shale gas?

  • Tsar Nicholas 4th Jan '16 - 10:08pm

    Good analysis by Paddy. Ming Campbell, though, is plain wrong.

  • Richard Underhill 5th Jan '16 - 12:57pm

    Please look at the casualties on both sides which happened in the Iran – Iraq war.
    The effect of the huge number of dead and wounded altered the demographics.
    At an AGM in Tunbridge Wells Nancy Seear told us that many women in the UK had not had husbands because of the deaths in World War One.
    Enid Lakeman agreed with her.
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/obituary-baroness-seear-1268965.html

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMartin 19th Jan - 10:14am
    Thank you Paul, even so I suspect nominations would have to be contrived to get five candidates. Nonetheless I do not think there will be...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Jan - 9:59am
    Thank you, Paul. so to clarify, if each candidate needs to be nominated by at least ten percent of *other* members of the Parliamentary party,...
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 19th Jan - 9:46am
    Catherine 18.5 Nominations must be of a Member of the Parliamentary Party in the House of Commons, who must be proposed by at least ten...
  • User AvatarTony Hagon 19th Jan - 9:45am
    I’m very sad to hear this and my condolences go to Helen and his family. Bob was passionate about the arts in the Far North...
  • User AvatarCatherine Jane Crosland 19th Jan - 9:36am
    Martin is probably right in saying that it would not be possible for all five to stand, because it would not be possible for five...
  • User AvatarMolly 19th Jan - 9:24am
    The best way to help a favoured candidate secure a post permanently is to give them the advantage of having the job for a period...