A small step-forward for accountability – the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standard’s recommendation from before the election for the details of his rulings to be published online has recently been implemented, along with a couple of years of archives. You can now read the rulings here.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
- Are the men of violence back in British politics?
- Britain has too much government and too little democratic power
- Reform donations row shows how facts get trampled at Westminster
- LibLink: Anna Sabine, the 'Whispering' Lib Dem MP - "Do I seem weak now?
- Bobby Dean writes: The Resilient State: Rethinking fiscal rules for the 21st Century
Search
Op-eds
-
What I would have said about homeless children at Conference (Suzanne Fletcher)
-
Caron’s kitchen table diary (Caron Lindsay)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
What’s on at Conference today? (Caron Lindsay)
-
Lib Dems need a 25-year vision that sets out how we’ll change Britain (Phil Wainewright)
-
GUEST POST Reform and Labour are losing councillors fast
-
Farage's plan for a Trump satellite state?
-
Violet Bonham Carter and Mary Stocks remember the struggle for women's suffrage
-
Brighton Conference
-
The Joy of Six 1579
-
UK luxury business backed by David Cameron in £500K collapse
-
Lord Bonkers' Diary: They don't shout "Get in the hole!"
-
The Polly Bolton Band: The Lake Isle of Innisfree
-
Show us the money - should politics be funded by billionaires?
Recent Comments
Michal Simon
I agree with the basic diagnosis. The Liberal Democrats do not need another slogan that will briefly “cut through” in the media. They need an answer to a mu...
expats
Well, there were two articles in a National newspaper today... OK, it was the Guardian BUT at least they were there.. One very positive about 'moderate Tories ...
Janet King
Thank you so much for reminding us of the successful work which you and other local Liberal Democrat councillors do and have done over many years to sort out un...
Alan Jelfs
If we're talking a 25-year timescale than an essential part of that must be reducing the National Dept, currently costing £100billion a year to service. That ...
Jason Connor
In case you haven't heard, there is a cost of living crisis. So very high prices for food, I spent £70 on just a shop for myself the other day and not much for...


2 Comments
Mr Hemmings
I noticed from the financial registered interests on the parliaments site
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm/cmregmem/101025/hemming_john.htm
That you have registered the following.
Two flats in London, from one of which rental income is received.
House and office building in Birmingham, from which rental income is received.
Farmland and woodland in Devon, from which rental income is received.
Now I have mentioned on this site before, and it has been noted that the 2 flats owned by you in London where fully owned by yourself (No Mortgage)
However in order for you to claim a 2nd homes allowance in London, You took out another mortgage on one of your flats, and you used the money raised from the mortgage, to pay of the mortgage on your business premises in Birmingham.
You the claimed Mortgage interest payments on your home in London at the expense of the Tax Payer.
Although I have found, this highly questionable before, you have assured me that it does not break parliamentary standards, even though you have benefited financially by paying of the mortgage on your business premises.
According to the parliamentary site, you also receive a rental income on your office building in Birmingham, I was curious to whom was paying you rent for this office space?
Are you sure you believe it is entirely ethical to take out a 2nd mortgage on a flat, at the expense of the tax payer,in order to raise funds and then pay off a mortgage on a business premises, and then to earn a rental income from that business premises as well?
I am not saying that it is in breech of parliamentary standards,i am asking if you believe it is ethical
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12001909
“The auditor general has refused to fully sign off MPs’ expenses accounts for last year.
Amyas Morse raised concerns about nearly £15m of payments made in 2009-10, the year of the expenses scandal.
He said evidence could not be obtained for £1.8m of claims, because those MPs were under police investigation.
Despite a “major exercise” evidence had not been obtained for another £0.8m and evidence provided for £11.3m was not considered sufficient by auditors”
When is this sham going to be rectified thats what I want to know.
There are some people from some political parties, throwing mud, saying that their MP’s are not caught up in this muck, and yet here we are with at least 15 million pounds that the auditors refusing to sign off.
The standards committee are taking far to long in investigating these cases in my opinion and they are just hoping that with time, the scandal will go away.