Paul Tyler writes: Boundary changes focus the minds of Tory hopefuls

If you think Tory rivalry is at fever pitch, you ain’t seen nothing yet.  The accidental coincidence of the forthcoming constituency boundary changes with the aftermath of the EU Referendum campaign may come to haunt David Cameron or his successor.

The imminence of the boundary review – with its planned reduction of Commons Members from 650 to 600 – means that almost every single Conservative MP will be facing his or her new “selectorate” in a  matter of a few months’ time.   The volume of Tory MPs siding with “LEAVE” is hardly surprising in that light.  Tory activists are increasingly Eurosceptic and the Daily Telegraph rates them currently 75% for “LEAVE”. This makes them even more unrepresentative of Conservative voters, and of the electorate as a whole, than previously.

It is said that for these four months the Prime Minister’s enemies are predominantly behind him. Yet for individual backbenchers, their enemies are everywhere, with the most significant to their side.  As the number of constituencies available decreases, so too the number of blue bums on green seats.  They will be competing with others of their own party colleagues to be chosen in a constituency that they can hope to win. Prior to the General Election, the salami-slicing process would have given Tory MPs hope that they could scoop up Liberal Democrat seats in the South West. Now there are no Liberal Democrat seats in the South West, their competition will be with each other.

In short, when it comes to weighing up their career prospects the view of their local Association activists will count for more than the blandishments of No 10.   And many recent recruits to the House of Commons are full-time politicians, with little or no hope of an easy job move elsewhere.   Self interest is a powerful motivator.

Whatever the outcome of the Referendum there will be accusations of treachery and betrayal. In the even REMAIN remains ahead, UKIP will prosper from disgruntled LEAVE voters. Conservative MPs will then find themselves in a race to be most Eurosceptic in the selection campaigns, and in races against ‘outers’ at the actual election. This will also provide unwelcome (to them) opportunities for revived Lib Dems to challenge for the support of moderate voters, who had hitherto been reassured by Cameron’s promise of “compassionate conservatism”.

Labour MPs too will be at risk, from a different disjuncture between their members and the voting public. The Corbynista promise of “no deselections” for moderates is not worth the paper it isn’t written on.  The explicit aim of the forthcoming boundary review to achieve greater equality of electorates means that more current Labour seats than Conservative ones will disappear altogether.  No Labour MP can guarantee to be facing the same local party as he or she did when selected previously, so wholesale re-selection will be the order of the day.  Can we really see Momentum quietly standing back while allegedly ‘right-wing’ Labour MPs get re-selected? The dysfunctional relationship between the Labour membership and their Parliamentary Party will be played out in a series of bloodthirsty coups throughout the Midlands and the North of England.

The referendum and its outcome are far more important than any of these individual scraps, but when you hear an MP taking sides in the REMAIN and LEAVE debate, Boris is not the only one whose decision may have more to do with their own future than that of the United Kingdom.

* Lord Tyler is the Liberal Democrat Lords Spokesperson for Political and Constitutional Reform.

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Eddie Sammon 29th Feb '16 - 8:45pm

    George Osborne, tactician in chief, needs to be told that gerrymandering is not a game. I’d also rather have 700 MPs than 600, but there you go.

    I’m not against boundary reviews per se, I’m just against gerrymandered constituencies that have no relation to their local community.

  • derek jacobs 1st Mar '16 - 8:28am

    Given that con/lab dominate in england and wales and neither seems ready to alter FPTP,
    i fully concur with a reduction(the same is even more apt for the Lords).
    Most of the over representation is in Wales,urban north and midlands,giving a unfair advantage to Lab..my own region,Eastern,will only reduce by one(in my County of Essex).
    I don’t see the tories having a problem,as some members retire at the end of each parliament .Lab will have more trouble,given the above.

  • How Dave must regret shredding his fig leaf. No Lib Dems too trot out and face the electorate with bad news, no Lib Dems to blame for not giving his right wingers their way. Poor Dave misunderstood what his party stood for and misunderstood what his membership believed.

    There will be a blood bath on all sides when the new boundaries are announced, the Labour, Tory and SNP politicians will be at each others throats looking for a seat.

  • Frankie, whilst I agree with your overall point, I must point out that if the Tories had passed Clegg’s Lords Reform, the Lib Dems would have supported these boundary changes, and thereby not been the fig-leaf you mention.

  • Phyllis,

    But strangely the Tories didn’t and they where; the convenient scape goat to prevent Dave from carrying out policies he really (in my opinion) didn’t want to implement but lacked the guts to actually say so.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarIan 28th Jan - 7:20am
    This soft Tory vote is motivated mostly by fear of Labour. Not just Corbyn, but any Labour government. I’m thinking of voters like my mother,...
  • User AvatarManfarang 28th Jan - 2:35am
    How much is the Labour Party going to Red Book shaped is what will determine relations between the Liberal Democrats and Labour.
  • User AvatarLorenzo Cherin 28th Jan - 1:23am
    We honour Holocaust Memorial Day and as Liberal Democrats this is the only real aspect of today that should fire us up!
  • User AvatarHywel 27th Jan - 11:49pm
    I wonder what Nick's record of success in political campaigns looks like. It's a fair question to ask of someone setting out a political strategy.
  • User AvatarRuth Bright 27th Jan - 11:26pm
    Glenn - quite. Converting non-voters is a more likely strategy. Nick Tyrone has achieved his goal of getting some attention a bit like when Germaine...
  • User AvatarJohn Roffey 27th Jan - 11:12pm
    Katharine Pindar 27th Jan '20 - 7:53pm "John Roffey. Thanks, John, but I am curbing my international instincts here to concentrate on the needs of...