PMQs: Opposition leader asks: “Can I agree with the Prime Minister”?

2012’s first Prime Minister’s Questions started with a bit of a score draw about rail fares. It got rather heated as Ed Miliband said the government had allowed fares to go up by 11%. He said:

The last Labour government saw that the train companies were taking advantage of consumers…we took away that power from them

David Cameron retorted that:

The power (to increase fares well above inflation) was given to them to do that by the last Labour government.

Channel 4 News FactCheck, as usual,has an excellent analysis of this spat, concluding that they couldn’t give either men a “Fact” or “Fiction” rating:

Labour may not have invented the practice but they allowed the operators to get away with it for 12 of their 13 years in government, until changing tack just before the last general election. It’s not clear whether the new policy would have been permanent.

But it’s indisputable that the Coalition abandoned it when they came to power, putting commuters in the situation in which they now find themselves.

Perhaps the best summary comes from Stephen Joseph from the Campaign for Better Transport, who told FactCheck:

Fares in the UK are well above European averages. Both parties have bought the argument that the cost should be borne by fare-payers.

We would argue that other countries have taken a different view – that a good transport network benefits everyone and it should not just be paid for by fare-payers but through other means.

That ding-dong was followed by violent agreement on the subject of Scotland.

It was a deeply underwhelming start to the new year for Ed Miliband, who needed a good performance to counter recent rumblings in his party about his leadership. In the past, he has chosen some good subjects on which to tax Cameron. The rail fare thing really was a mistake, given Labour’s record on the subject. He tried hard, but it just didn’t wash.

You can’t fault Miliband’s sincerity and belief. I would prefer to talk with him than Cameron. But he is relatively hopeless at PMQs, labouriously blathering away and tripping over his words. No style. No real wit. Just blundering on.

I think of previous Labour leaders. Smith, Blair, Foot…even Kinnock. Miliband is simply not as good as them. The only close comparison to Miliband I can think of is Gordon Brown. That’s not flattering.

LibDem Questions:

Greg Mulholland asked whether the PM would ensure that the White Paper on the care of older people will present a real way forward “on this vital issue”.

Mike Crockart asked if Cameron will ensure that 2012 is the last year that the Guantanamo Bay detention centre operates.

Sir Bob Russell asked a very powerful question which I quote in full:

Ethnic cleansing and apartheid are evil. Sadly, successive Governments have supported a country where those vile actions are inflicted on indigenous people. We welcomed the Arab spring, but the long Arab winter continues for Palestinians. Last Tuesday the Israeli Government said that they would proceed with the forced eviction of 30,000 Bedouin Arabs from their historic lands. Is it not time we treated Israel as we did apartheid South Africa?

Paul Walter blogs at Liberal Burblings

* Paul Walter is a Liberal Democrat activist and member of the Liberal Democrat Voice team. He blogs at Liberal Burblings.

Read more by or more about , , , , or .
This entry was posted in PMQs.
Advert

One Comment

  • Malcolm Todd 12th Jan '12 - 10:15am

    “Mike Crockart asked if Cameron will ensure that 2012 is the last year that the Guantanamo Bay detention centre operates.”
    — How on earth did he imagine Cameron would do that?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Roland
    But what are "low taxes" other than just a sound-bite? With hindsight we can see focusing on "low-taxes" - like the tories have for many decades, has only re...
  • nigel hunter
    We cannot fund the needs of the people and country if we are a low tax party....
  • Jonathan Calder
    Do we want to be a low-tax party? It seems the leadership wants to fight the next election on that basis, but I detect no great enthusiasm for the idea among th...
  • Nick Baird
    @Alex @Rees - I was referring to the quoted surveys by VPZ and E-Cigarette Direct, who have a vested interest in selling vapes and are effectively claiming that...
  • Rees Southern
    Hi David. Further to my earlier response, I forwarded your concerns to someone who has worked with tobacco harm reduction organisations. This was their response...