Tag Archives: sir bob russell

PMQs: Balls! Balls! Balls! Balls!

By golly by gosh, I think Ed Miliband has finally got in the swing of this Prime Minister’s Questions thing. While Cameron reeled from his Tuesday night beating by a right Jesse, the leader of the opposition appeared poised, relaxed and skilful. He’s learnt the knack of brevity and humour, as his first question demonstrated:

At this last Question Time before the recess, may I remind the

Posted in PMQs | Also tagged , , , and | 6 Comments

PMQs: Opposition leader asks: “Can I agree with the Prime Minister”?

2012’s first Prime Minister’s Questions started with a bit of a score draw about rail fares. It got rather heated as Ed Miliband said the government had allowed fares to go up by 11%. He said:

The last Labour government saw that the train companies were taking advantage of consumers…we took away that power from them

David Cameron retorted that:

The power (to increase fares well above inflation) was given to them to do that by the last Labour government.

Channel 4 News FactCheck, as usual,has an excellent analysis of this spat, concluding that they couldn’t give either men a “Fact” or “Fiction” …

Posted in PMQs | Also tagged , , , and | 1 Comment
Advert



Recent Comments

  • Michael 1
    @nvelope2003 Article 24 of the Lib Dem constitution outlines how the Liberal Democrats would act in the event of "Support for a government which contains ot...
  • Michael 1
    @Simon Hebditch Thanks for your comment. The Labour party didn't advise its supporters to vote Liberal Democrat in Chesham and Amersham - although clearly...
  • Simon Hebditch
    As a supporter of the so-called progressive alliance, I welcome the Lib Dem victory in Chesham and Amersham. Clearly, thousands of Labour voters decided to supp...
  • John Marriott
    I cannot call on any scientific evidence for the following; but I have always been fascinated by the statements of winning candidates, when they affirm that it ...
  • Steve Trevethan
    Are there any human activities which, without optimal regulation, stated and unstated, do not benefit the more powerful to the cost of the weaker? Why should t...