Top punter Mike Smithson is tipping readers of his politicalbetting.com site to watch Brian Paddick in the London mayoral election. With the collapse of support for Ken Livingstone, he now thinks Brian is the only man who can save London from a Boris Johnson mayoralty. You can read Mike’s comments here. The Nick Cohen comments Mike refers to are on his site.
Subscribe
-
Follow @libdemvoice.org on Bluesky
-
Like us on Facebook
-
Subscribe to our feed
-
Sign-up for our daily email digest
Most Read
Search
Op-eds
-
Winning Britain’s Cities: A Liberal Vision for Urban Britain (Patrick Stillman)
-
Tom Arms’ World Review (Tom Arms)
-
Observations of an Expat: Canada (Tom Arms)
-
Remember why we started: What the Hong Kong Alliance case means for Hong Kong’s future (Arthur Wu)
-
Are the Liberal Democrats invisible? (Veronica-Mae Soar)
-
After Dark podcast: Dr Louise Brangan on the Magdalene laundries
-
Dunston fair video
-
The Joy of Six 1569
-
Marjory Allen encounters the ban on child actors in British films
-
Wyn Griffith and David Lloyd George
-
Etran de L'Aïr: Imouha
-
DNA Methylation Clocks - what utility do they have?
-
Farage channelling Trump again
Recent Comments
Big Tall Tim
VERY well said James and Tristan....
tom arms
And is it or is it not a perfect opportunity for Ed Davey to make waves, political capital and foreign policy? And-- given his past pronouncements on Trump-- is...
paul barker
I agree with almost every word of this but I must point out that The Green performance involved a great deal of luck, in getting a winnable By-election at the r...
Hywel
Nicely played David Green :-)...
Peter Davies
@David Allen: Indeed. writing good articles for LDV is an ideal way to start....


7 Comments
So this would be Lib Dem member and former general election candidate Mike Smithson saying he quite likes a Lib Dem candidate? Meanwhile The Guardian is arguing for dumping Paddick and replacing him with Vince Cable. Paddick has struggled to get into double figures in the polls; the idea that he will win is ludicrous.
One big problem witht the mayor race is the electoral system.
If no one gets 50% then only the top two go forward for the second round.
If say Boris got 40% and Ken & Brian got 25% each then just a couple of votes will decide the top two.
Anti Tory transfers could easily propell the sencond person into the top job.
Why couldn’t they go for a proper STV count – oh yes because the Tories & LAbour wanted to stack the system against the other parties!
“So this would be Lib Dem member and former general election candidate Mike Smithson saying he quite likes a Lib Dem candidate?”
Anyone, of any allegiance, who reads pb.com knows that Mike tends to err, if at all, away from the LDs. He recently wrote two pieces here – one in which he explained why he typically doesn’t gamble on LD successes, and another doubting that the LDs will hold the balance of power at the next election.
He openly predicted the successive downfalls of Kennedy and Ming and, if anything, is accused by some of overstressing Cameron’s (and Boris’s) electoral chances.
Wishful thinking. The line which contradicts your position is:
“If he came second on the first count, the argument goes, he would pick up the lion’s share of Ken’s second preferences. Even then I don’t think that Paddick can overhaul Johnson”.
Draft Vince?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/mar/22/religion.usa
Real votes in real ballot boxes ahould count for something. Since last September, total votes received by the major parties at all London council by-elections (16 by-elections in 15 different boroughs) have been:
Liberal Democrat 14,267 (36.3 per cent)
Conservative 11,092 (28.2 per cent)
Labour 9,912 (25.2 per cent).
The Greens had 1,464 (3.7 per cent) and after them only the BNP managed more than a thousand in total – 1,018.
Now from those figures who looks most likely to beat Livingstone. Oh! It isn’t Boris.
Sorry, typo there. Should have been 16 by-elections in 14 different boroughs. Both Brent and Harrow had two by-elections since last September.