Pressure grows on Jacqui Smith over expense claims

The former chairman of the Standards Committee, Sir Alistair Graham, has acquired rather a habit of speaking out bluntly to put pressure on MPs over their standards and he’s done it again on Newsnight:

“It must not look as if you’re manipulating expenses for your own financial gain.”

If it is found Ms Smith resides in her London home more nights a week than her Redditch home, he said: “She’ll be in the clear in the sense of the rules, but in the sense of her political career – she won’t be.” (PoliticsHome)

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News and Parliament.
Advert

5 Comments

  • Isn’t it a debateable point whether primary residence requires you to stay there for a majority of nights (or are there some firm rules on that point)

    What might be interesting is if someone investigated what address she had on the ballot paper at the last election, what address she uses for tax purposes, where her car(s) are registered, where her bank statements/credit card bills go to etc.

    Those, IMO are more indicative of where your primary residence is.

    And of course making statements like “She still lives in Redditch with husband, Richard and sons James (13) and Michael (8).” are indicative of what she regards as her primary residence.

  • Hywel
    “Isn’t it a debateable point whether primary residence requires you to stay there for a majority of nights (or are there some firm rules on that point)”

    The Green Book on Parliamentary Salaries, Allowances and Pensions (2005) says:
    “If you have more than one home, your main home will normally be the one where you spend more nights than any other.”

  • Simon Wilson 19th Feb '09 - 10:38am

    As Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith has 24 hour police protection. Presumably then, her movements and living arrangements must be reocrded somewhere.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Gary Peacock
    I very much agree with you, Karen. I know our (and my) attachment to the triple lock, but if there was a means of linking the pension to earnings over a longer...
  • Peter Davies
    @David Warren: a Universal Basic Income would undoubtedly be that big bold policy that people would talk about. The leadership is implacably opposed to it....
  • expats
    @Jana 30th Sep '26 - 7:18am Using your ship analogy.. So the nearest ship on the scene should take EVERYONE, permanently, whilst others should take none?I d...
  • Jack
    Jana that is a reductive and shameful argument that discounts situational complexity, operates from the stance that refugees should accept the absolute minimum ...
  • Jana
    @Nick Baird If I were at sea and my ship was sinking, I would be grateful to be rescued by whatever ship was closest…I wouldn’t then expect to be able to t...