Proof that not *all* Tories are bonkers on Europe (and nor was Mrs Thatcher)

margaret thatcher europeAmidst all the Tory Euro-hysteria (‘Eurotic’, I’ve heard it described as: and I seriously hope I didn’t mis-hear) it’s easy to forget there are a few Tories, a diminishing if stoic band, who have kept tight hold of their senses.

And though it was David Cameron’s desperate last-ditch pitch for the job of Tory leader — his 2005 promise to his party’s Europhobes to withdraw the Tories from the mainstream centre-right EPP alliance, a policy even David Davis wouldn’t touch — which has, slowly but inevitably, dragged the party ever more fringewards, a few of his backbenchers remain hopeful they can persuade him, even now, to do the sensible thing.

Here’s some of what they’ve written to him:

We acknowledge the EU’s shortcomings and understand the desire and, under the Lisbon Treaty the possibility, to repatriate powers. However, we do our nation, as well as Europe, a disservice by not confidently exerting the same level of engagement and leadership as we demonstrate in organisations such as NATO, the G8, the UN Security Council or the Commonwealth.

When Britain does engage we get positive results. Many of the core features of today’s EU are thanks to British leadership. The Single Market is the creation of Margaret Thatcher and enlargement was the key legacy of John Major. Both helped create world’s biggest trading area which has enabled the UK to become the number one destination in Europe for foreign direct investment. From economic reform, deregulation, competition, trade and the environment, the EU is now following a policy agenda largely fashioned by the UK. Far from being perpetually isolated, we should stress that such an outcome has been achieved by the UK with the help of strong allies and continued goodwill. …

The UK has potential allies on many key issues, even on the merits of repatriating some powers. We fear that a renegotiation which seems to favour the UK alone would force other capitals to ask why they cannot simply dispense with those parts of the Single Market that don’t suit them … If you decide to give the British people a referendum, we will be supporting you, not only in making the case for continued membership of the EU, but in enhancing our leadership both in Brussels and the capitals of Europe, in the national interest, namely completing the Single Market, attracting foreign direct investment into the UK and exercising our strategic value in the eyes of our allies, particularly the United States. Like you, we want to be in Europe – for Britain.

You can read their optimistic and hopeful (in every sense) letter in full here.

I doff my cap to the 15 who signed it…

    Laura Sandys
    Margot James
    Stephen Dorrell
    Ben Gummer
    Ben Wallace
    Richard Ottaway
    Bob Walter
    Robert Buckland
    Neil Carmichael
    Caroline Spelman
    Nicholas Soames
    Peter Luff
    Jane Ellison
    Sir Malcolm Rifkind
    Kris Hopkins

…but perhaps the most telling aspect of the letter is this revelation in today’s FT:

Such is the anti-European sentiment in the party that only 15 of the signatories allowed their names to be published. Another 10 insisted on anonymity in the face of virulent anti-European sentiment in their local associations.

How far has the Tory party come since 1988 and Margaret Thatcher’s declaration in her famous Bruges speech (which makes quite astonishing reading today):

The European Community belongs to all its members. It must reflect the traditions and aspirations of all its members. And let me be quite clear. Britain does not dream of some cosy, isolated existence on the fringes of the European Community. Our destiny is in Europe, as part of the Community. … I am the first to say that on many great issues the countries of Europe should try to speak with a single voice. I want to see us work more closely on the things we can do better together than alone. Europe is stronger when we do so, whether it be in trade, in defence or in our relations with the rest of the world.

What was then seen as her anti-Europeanism was the trigger (along with the poll tax) for Mrs Thatcher’s decapitation by her party. Today it would be her excessive pro-Europeanism that would see her in trouble with the Tories.

* Stephen was Editor (and Co-Editor) of Liberal Democrat Voice from 2007 to 2015, and writes at The Collected Stephen Tall.

Read more by or more about , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , or .
This entry was posted in News.


  • @jedineeftrix

    It’s bonkers because the other member states aren’t going to agree to it.

    Let’s see, proposal – the UK will opt out of Policing measures and then negotiate bi-lateral agreements with the other member states.

    So, Greece is going to waste its tax-payers money doing this, are they? They have nothing else to spend their monies on, right?

    Or, proposal – the term to acquire permanent residence will be raised from 5 to 10 years.
    So, Donald Tusk – the Polish PM – will agree to a proposal which will mean the UK can make life more difficult for Polish citizens in the UK? Do you think he has a political death wish?

  • Paul McKeown 18th Jan '13 - 1:21pm

    The “Plebishite” has nothing to do with British interests and everything to do with attempting to maintain internal party cohesion – and it hasn’t even the faintest hope of achieving that. Pi is a transcendental number: you cannot square the circle.

    The Lib Dems should be prepared to welcome light blue asylum seekers from the civil war that has riven the Conservative Party for the last twenty years. Leave Cameron with the Valkyrie wing of his party, may it bring him unbounden joy.

  • Martin Lowe 18th Jan '13 - 7:42pm


    I’ll tell you something else that’s bonkers about that Fresh Start document – the fact that it thinks junior doctors need to work 90+ hour weeks like they did in the good old days when they would kill patients through exhaustion.

    The fact that they are scraping the barrel for things like this to beat the EU with is what makes them bonkers.

    Hell – why don’t they also campaign for more flexibility in employment of lorry drivers and do away with that inconvenient and restrictive tachograph technology that incurs extra cost on business too?

  • Martin Lowe 18th Jan '13 - 7:42pm

    The stuff about junior doctors is on page 20 in case you don’t believe me.

  • Martin Lowe 20th Jan '13 - 2:05pm

    No response from our resident Eurosceptic. I wonder why 😉

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Mick Taylor
    Most, if not all, people who have come to the UK to live, pay taxes, here in the UK. It's only filthy rich people who get away with claiming non-dom status. Lab...
  • Andrew Tampion
    Peter Watson: "but the impression was left that the nett figure was still a big one with little explanation of the good things it bought us." That is because t...
  • Simon R
    @Nigel I don't see it as at all irrelevant if a person maintains a right to vote in another country. One person one vote is a fundamental principle of our democ...
  • Lee Thacker
    "Only the Scottish Liberal Democrats can beat the nationalists in huge swathes of Scotland." That is clearly not true....
  • Peter Watson
    @Chris Moore "the 350 MILLION figure was an effective piece of propaganda, but false." A failure to properly address this was one of the many disappointing asp...