Recent stats on caring

I’ve been delving into the Department of Work and Pensions Family Resources Survey 2016/17 published recently. It contains statistics in five broad categories: Income and State Support; Tenure; Disability; Care; and Pensions.

It is the Care statistics which I’d like to highlight today. I’ve written previously on this site about carers, highlighting the prevalence of women doing the majority of care-work around the world.

These recent Family Resources Survey stats show that the largest portion of informal care is for ageing parents. 33% of this care is for parents not living in the same household, whilst 7% care for parents living with the carer. The next largest portion of informal care is the 19% caring for a spouse or partner in their own household.

Informal care includes

helping with shopping, preparing meals and feeding, household chores, dressing, washing. In 2016/17, 8 per cent (5.4 million) of people were informal carers.

Women do more informal caring than men, up to the age of 84. The last category, of those aged over 85, is the only one in which more men are carers than women.

Forty-eight per cent of men providing informal care were in full-time employment compared to 26 per cent of women. Women providing informal care were much more likely to be in part-time employment than men; 25 per cent of women providing informal care worked part-time compared to 8 per cent of men.

Looking at the effect on daily life, 29% of informal carers provided more than 35 hours of care per week. Many unpaid hours of care are given by men and women up and down this country every day.

We need to value the free work which undergirds our society. It is one reason I am keen on a citizen’s income. A basic income would value, in a small way, the thousands of hours of care that is currently gratuitous. It seems the fairest way to recognise the extraordinary contribution many are making to society.

A link to the datasets and tables is here.

* Kirsten Johnson is the PPC for North Devon and Day Editor of Lib Dem Voice.

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert



Recent Comments

  • User AvatarKatharine Pindar 20th Aug - 12:38am
    Michael 1, I for one loved your ironic posts earlier this evening! Your amusing skit on why council officers don't really think ANY month is...
  • User Avatarfrankie 20th Aug - 12:10am
    Lord Jeff I often wondered where Brexiteers got their cut and paste material, in your case it's the Sun. The same poll said over 55's...
  • User AvatarJayne Mansfield 19th Aug - 9:57pm
    @ Michael1, I have a bee in my bonnet. Maybe you were employing satire, but I am afraid that in the context of so many...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 19th Aug - 9:50pm
    @Paul Holmes: prior to 1962 the UK did have an open border for commonwealth citizens, which our predecessor party fought to retain. As members of...
  • User AvatarRoger Roberts 19th Aug - 9:41pm
    A separate poll organised by the 3 devolved parliaments could indicate the level of support for Brexit in each of those nations. Could this Tory...
  • User AvatarMick Taylor 19th Aug - 9:36pm
    I beg to differ with former MP Paul Holmes. The problem with this motion (and the policy paper) is that the tone and language are...