Sadness and pride as Scottish Asssisted Dying Bill falls

I’m full of emotion tonight. Sad that the Scottish Parliament rejected the Assisted Dying (Terminally Ill Adults) Bill which would have made us the first nation in the UK to allow assisted dying for those with less than 6 months to live if they wanted it.

After a week of late night sittings considering amendments, the Bill fell at its final hurdle by 57 votes to 69.

I’m also proud, though. Immensely proud. Liam McArthur could have done no more. His calm, his persuasive efforts to build support for this measure beyond any of its predecessors, taking it through to its final parliamentary stage, his willingness to listen and accept amendments. I don’t think anyone else could have taken it this far.

It was clear fairly early on that the initial vote on the principles of the Bill was not going to hold. It never really was. Tonight’s result is not a huge surprise, though it will be a huge disappointment to the vast majority of the Scottish public who support an assisted dying measure.

I was one of them. The intense suffering of my mother-in-law, witnessed when I was 20, her rage that she was still alive every time she woke up in pain, shaped my opinion. Yet I also hear the fears of my disabled friends and colleagues who worry this is a slippery slope. I don’t want anyone to feel that their lives are not valued. That was not the point of this.

However, Liam’s bill was watertight – only accessible by those with 6 months or less to live with more safeguards than any other legislation in the world.

The forthcoming Scottish Parliament elections may well provide a different balance of MSPs. Some of the Bill’s prominent opponents are standing down.

After the vote, Liam expressed his disappointment:

I am obviously deeply disappointed at the result of tonight’s vote. For many MSPs this will have been the last significant vote they will cast in their time in Parliament. I know many have wrestled with their consciences. They will now have to live with their decisions.

In the coming days, there will be time to reflect on why the bill couldn’t quite make it across the line but for now, I would like to thank my staff, the campaign groups and parliamentarians who have backed this bill and most of all, the terminally ill Scots and their families who have told their stories. I am sorry that Parliament has denied you this compassionate choice tonight.

However, for now we should be proud that this is by far the most votes that an assisted dying bill has ever secured in the Scottish Parliament. This is not a conversation that is going away. For so long as dying Scots continue to suffer as a result of the lack of choice and safety afforded to them by the current law, I’m certain that it will be an issue in front of Parliament once more.

I hope that, whatever our position on the Bill, we can all agree that the way Liam has conducted himself in such a collaborative, persuasive, calm way, has been a huge asset. He made the Scottish Parliament be its best.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings. You can find her on Bluesky at caronmlindsay.bsky.social

Read more by or more about , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.
Advert

One Comment

  • Andy Chandler 18th Mar '26 - 9:44am

    Thank you, Caron, on sharing your own story with your late mum and being so open about your experiences. I am so sorry your mum had to suffer; as did my own late mum with late stage bowel cancer.

    I know its a sensitive issue, and I extend your thoughts that I thought Liam McArthur handled this with such humility, grace and openness; in all it stages.

    I always said I believe in giving people choice and think people should have that choice so they don’t have to prolong their suffering. Its giving them liberty in life and in their death.

    I thought the Bill was suffice. However, I too Caron just want to use this opportunity to listen. I like you don’t want to wage war at people who have concerns. Work will need to be done to help strengthen the safeguards and concerns people expressed, even if I thought the Bill was, in my opinion, watertight like you expressed. But if this is to become a exercise in listening then its needs to be transactional, and also listen to examples like your own with your late mum and my own with my late mum.

    As my mum said to me “People should meet God on their own flight plan.”

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Chambers
    > The standout project is Ajax, which should be immediately cancelled. Oh if only! Ben Wallace confided that "the money is spent" and that if the programme...
  • Tristan Ward
    It has been perfectly obvious since the start of trump's second term that UK defence spending must rise. The political difficulty is equally obvious given th...
  • cim
    @Nick Baird - Even taking a quarter off the UK's budget would still keep us comfortably in the top 10 for all countries and ahead of the (also nuclear-armed) Fr...
  • Jenny Barnes
    We probably do need to increase tax to fund defence. Borrowing depends on the markets beleiving that the country can afford to pay it back, which would requir...
  • Nick Baird
    Thank you Simon - I agree that a tax rise is the way to fund increased defence expenditure. My issue with Defence Bonds is not that it increases borrowing, b...