Second time round, Lib Dems scuppered in bid to block third reading of Parliament FoI exemption bill

Commenting on today’s debate on the Freedom of Information (Amendment) Bill in the House of Commons, Liberal Democrat Shadow Justice Secretary, Simon Hughes MP said:

“This has been a shameful day for the House of Commons – MPs should set an example of open government, not apply it to everybody but ourselves.

“David Maclean’s Bill and the way it has got through the Commons will clearly diminish respect for Parliament. But the battle will go on and hopefully the Lords will deliver us from this terrible mistake. 

“I hope the public will make their views very clear to the MPs who supported the Bill and to the next Prime Minister that this is absolutely the wrong direction for open, accountable government.”

Liberal Democrat Shadow Leader of the House, David Heath MP added:

“This was a black day for Parliament.

“Firstly, because a bad bill which will damage both Freedom of Information and the reputation of Parliament was passed.

“Secondly, because Parliamentary procedure meant that many MPs could not make their voices heard.

“And thirdly, because the Government has been able to claim that it was neutral on the Bill while cynically doing everything it could to mobilise support for the former Conservative Chief Whip.”

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

9 Comments

  • Hywel Morgan 18th May '07 - 5:30pm

    Well that was an embarrasing damp squib.

    In final vote just 11 Lib Dem MPs were voting. Only 16 Lib Dem MPs took part in the debate (either voting or speaking). Two London MPs (Brake & Featherstone) were among those not present.

    Yesterday Ming emailed all members saying:

    “The Freedom of Information Act is a vital tool for allowing members of the public to assess whether their MPs are doing so.

    We must not allow it to be compromised.”

    Today – as far as I can see – he was among those Lib Dem MPs not turning up.

    If it was important enough to email members about – why was it not important enough to merit a three line whip

    Its a pretty disgraceful example of us being “full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”

  • Hywel Morgan 18th May '07 - 5:35pm

    According to Hansard (still subject to corrections) these were the Lib Dem MPs voting against at 3rd reading

    Baker, Norman
    Burt, Lorely
    Farron, Tim
    Gidley, Sandra
    Goldsworthy, Julia
    Harris, Dr. Evan
    Howarth, David
    Hughes, Simon
    Kramer, Susan
    (Tellers)
    Mr. Alan Reid and
    Jo Swinson

    Also participating in earlier votes
    Cable
    Opik
    Sanders
    Williams (S)
    Williams (R)
    Burt
    Heath
    Kramer

  • Hywel Morgan 18th May '07 - 7:30pm

    Hmmm – my other pearls of wisdom appear to be lost forever.

    What I think is pretty poor is the low proportion of our MPs who turned out on this issue.

    Yesterday the leader thought it important enough to email members about – but where were he and others today?

  • Hywel Morgan 19th May '07 - 10:39am
  • Top stories on the BBC News website today: ‘Gordon Brown rejetcs calls to block moves for MPs to get out of the FOI laws’..then – ‘Brown promises to build trust in politics as the next PM. Promises to build trust in our democracy, and sets out the need to move to an open form of dialogue with citizens and politicians, to genuinely talk about problems and solutions’
    Well he’s got off to a great start. No wonder he’s smiling!

  • Hywel,

    Just for the record I think you will find Lynne Featherstyone may well be “absent with leave” owing to an attack of shingles.

  • Does the Daily Mail political editor Benedict Brogan not sum it up on his blog:

    “Sir Menzies Campbell may have spent the past 24 hours haranguing the Chancellor to speak up for FoI and stop the Bill, but did not vote against it himself – or order his MPs to either”

    http://broganblog.dailymail.co.uk/2007/05/foi_mps_lists_o.html#comments

    Was it more important for Sir Menzies to be back in Scotland than voting on this matter? Why did he not issue a 3-line whip? Makes all the letter-writing to the Chancellor and TV appearances look very silly indeed.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jason Connor
    The Greens, Lib Dems and Conservatives are all standing. They all see sense and believe in democratic choices....
  • Mick Taylor
    @Lawrence Cox. To read your comment one might want to believe that the Triple Lock has ensured pensioners have decent pensions. It hasn't and UK state pensions ...
  • Chloe
    A Blue Labour response recent events in Hampshire. Well worth a read. https://www.paulembery.com/p/for-the-race-obsessed-british-state...
  • theakes
    A new strategy/approach requires a new leader...
  • Kira Collins
    You use the phrase “fiscal federalism” and “financial autonomy” but have not used the phase I had hoped to see that is drawn out of both: fiscal autonom...