Mark Pack

Should Boris Johnson’s Forensic Audit Panel be auditing itself?

By | Fri 20th June 2008 - 8:10 pm

When Boris Johnson set up his Forensic Audit Panel to investigate financial goings on at the London Development Agency, he boasted about how all the people on the panel were working for free and made no mention of any other costs being involved. (Mayor’s Question Time, 21st May, full transcript here.)

Amongst its members is Andrew Gordon of PriceWaterhouseCoopers, where he is Head of Investigations in their Forensic Services group. Given the allegations over the LDA, such expertise sounds very welcome.

But, but, but … it has now turned out that although the panel are working for free, £50,000 is to be given to PriceWaterhouseCoopers to carry out investigations.

This raises a whole host of questions: why didn’t Boris Johnson say anything about the £50,000 before? How were PriceWaterhouseCoopers selected to get the £50,000? Is there any connection between that and Andrew Gordon’s presence on the panel? Was there any agreement at the time at which he was appointed to the panel? And so on. On past form, don’t expect a speedy and detailed response from Boris Johnson though.

 

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in London.
Advert

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • David Allen
    The case for higher taxes is blatantly clear, unless you are a politician seeking votes. Everything in Britain - the NHS, the courts, the prisons, defence, and...
  • FS People
    @ Mick Taylor “The whole thrust of our complex and bewildering tax code IS to protect the rich. ” But it is not. We actually tax high earners more as a pr...
  • FS People
    The defences of the triple lock are just bizarre. @Mick Taylor “You propose making that worse by stopping uprating pensions.” That is not what was sai...
  • Pawel Urbanski
    I agree that capacity is the problem, but I think we might be fixing the wrong end of it first. Right now thousands of affordable homes are going up under pl...
  • Jana
    My memory of being brought up in a council house was that ordinary working people lived in council houses and wealthy people lived in private houses. Today, the...