Snoopers’ Charter back in the Commons

The Snoopers’ Charter, as the Investigatory Powers Bill is colloquially known, returns to the House of Commons over the next couple of days.

As you would expect, Alistair Carmichael has been working on many sensible amendments to the Bill which are supported by Liberty. It is also good to see that the SNP been on this as well. I was none too pleased when they didn’t oppose the Bill at Second Reading when there was a chance to kill it for good and even more worried when it wasn’t singled out for mention in the SNP’s Holyrood manifesto, unlike many other issues reserved to Westminster. I’m glad to see that they are supporting or indeed have come up with some good stuff.

Labour has its name to a few of the amendments supported by Liberty but we have learned that holding our breath when waiting for them to stand up for civil liberties is not the wisest course of action.

Liberty has prepared a pretty comprehensive briefing on the Bill, which manages to be technical yet encapsulates the key principles.

One of the most important for me is the idea that there should be reasonable suspicion before action is taken. The current Bill doesn’t provide such safeguards:

One of the greatest problems, recurrent in every power in the Bill, is the lack of a reasonable suspicion threshold for surveillance powers to be authorised.

Intrusive powers can be authorised in order to ‘prevent and detect serious crime’, or even (in the case of communications data’) to collect tax, prevent disorder, or in the interests of public safety. However, these general purposes are left wide open to broad interpretation and abuse without requiring a threshold of suspicion. A requirement of reasonable suspicion, when the purpose of preventing and detecting serious crime is invoked, would prevent the abusive surveillance of campaigners, unionists and victims by undercover police; police surveillance of journalists’ lawful activity; and the Agencies’ surveillance of law-abiding NGOs and MPs that we have seen in the recent past. However, the threshold would allow for authorisation of powers for serious and violent crimes.

The principles behind the amendments limit the powers of public bodies to authorise intrusive surveillance and they should be welcomed.

This stuff is important. The Government wants to enshrine in law huge and sweeping powers to legitimise surveillance on spurious grounds. It needs significantly re-writing to make it even half way to being acceptable.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about or .
This entry was posted in News.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Chris Perry
    Not sure from the above how many people have read the appended article ? If not, I would ask that you do, please? I am keen to get a debate going to test the va...
  • not a realperson
    Fuck Islam. All Muslims lie and want All Western Values Destroyed. You want to get-along with That Shit, Leave me and other non-retards out. Islam eventually...
  • David Raw
    @ Mark Valladares "They’re picked on the basis that they interest me – some have a vague personal connection". Hmmmmm, I don't suppose you're a descendant...
  • Mark ValladaresMark Valladares
    @ David, Because, if you read these pieces, you'll note that I pick three historical events each day. They're picked on the basis that they interest me - som...
  • David Raw
    Not sure why Mark refers to, "Today is the 276th anniversary of Bonnie Prince Charlie’s army occupying Carlisle". Not so sure about the hereditary (these d...