So, who are the 30?

The Daily Mail is hot on the heels of the “fewer than thirty women” that our leader Nick Clegg has apparently bedded.  It can exclusively reveal that Helena Bonham-Carter is not amongst the 30.  Well done, Daily Mail.  One woman down.  Only another 3,399,745,541 women left on the planet to rule out.

On another page of the same rag, columnist Amanda Platell roundly condemns the number, but somewhat glosses over her own sexual experience.  Since coy Miss Platell is unmarried, I can only assume she is either a virgin or a hypocrite.  A staggering number of those commenting manage to link Clegg’s dalliances with the vote on the Euro referendum.  Which is quite an imaginative stretch.

Steve Richards on the Indy blog foreshadows a Radio 4 discussion that will have aired by the time this is published. The political commentators are not impressed. Fellow Indy blogger Catherine Townsend is much more forgiving. As you might hope from someone who writes a blog called Sleeping Around.

The Eastern Daily Press is equally sanguine.  So what? they say, Nick is upping his street cred. The Oxford Mail’s ‘Insider’ is happy to hint at many more notches on his bedpost than Clegg’s.

And the Guardian takes a wider view, finding Clegg’s tally reasonably normal, before taking off around the country to ask random strangers how many people they’ve slept with.  Something tells me this isn’t something I’ll be vox popping on come conference time…

Read more by .
This entry was posted in News.
Advert

14 Comments

  • Antony Hook 5th Apr '08 - 2:39pm

    This farago is an example of the media deliberately misunderstanding a clearly flippant answer.

    I doubt it will do any long-term damage to Nick.

  • You should do that at autumn conference, Alex.

    “How many people have you slept with? And how many this week?”

  • All very well, but of course people giving plaudits to Nick Clegg for his HONESTY really need to explain why he refused to answer the question about drugs (shock, horror!) – or indeed, why he initially attempted, albeit unsuccessfully, to dodge the questions about sex.

    Or if they think this approach is such a rip-roaring success, they should email him for those answers about drugs, and post them here when they have them. And while they’re about it, they should check whether he’d be up for a few supplementary questions – on both subjects …

    Chris Phillips

  • Fewer than thirty includes everything from 1 to 29 (we assume at least 1 because of his children…)
    So this may simply be a way of hiding an unhip low number!

  • Indeed, it appears that Clegg himself now thinks he would have done better not to answer the questions about his sexual history:

    .

    “He was asked [on the Andrew Marr show] about the GQ interview in which he talked about the number of sexual partners he had, but would not talk about his drug use.

    Mr Clegg said he probably should be “consistent on both – and private on both”.”

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7333051.stm

    Chris Phillips

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

*
*
Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?

Advert

Recent Comments

  • Paul Holmes
    When I was an MP I remember being shown a block of Council flats in London. We stood on a first floor walkway and my guide pointed to one door that after RtBuy ...
  • Paul Holmes
    AlexB - Housing Associations already have the power to borrow money against their assets, which are of course not subject to the wholesale Right to Buy (at huge...
  • David McHardy
    There is no way out of the housing crisis without mass private building. Private building has stalled because it is unprofitable, as this article explains. This...
  • George Thomas
    "Of course, devolution cannot simply mean moving responsibilities without resources. Local leaders need meaningful fiscal powers, long-term funding settlements ...
  • George Thomas
    Greater devolution without greater funding is a poisoned chalice and that is what's being offered in Wales. That and sly digs at the Senedd. Then it leads t...