South Bronx is just as important as Seneca Falls, Selma and Stonewall

South Bronx - Some rights reserved by Nathan CongletonIt is lovely to watch a US President taking the oath of office and not be scared. The feeling of dread I experienced in 1981 and 2001 when Reagan and the younger Bush took office was not pleasant. While Barack Obama has not been perfect, his heart is generally in the right place. His achievements in his first term are all the more remarkable when you consider that he faced a Congress full of some of the most right wing, conservative Republicans we’ve seen in our lifetimes whose sole aim was to thwart his every move.

Obama’s inaugural speech was stirring and inspiring to liberal ears. His main theme was that every American should have the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness on which the nation was founded.

For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts. Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law  –-  — for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well. Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote. Our journey is not complete until we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity until bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country. Our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia, to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm.

He talked about how the “most evident of truths, that all of us are created equal….guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, Selma and Stonewall.” It’s strange to think that a strong declaration in favour of gay rights by the “leader of the free world” is seen as remarkable. All of this is great stuff and he was right to mention those places were so pivotal in developing equal rights. There is another place beginning with S, though, which symbolises action required to tackle another great barrier to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. South Bronx is the poorest Congressional District in the US.

While I’m glad to hear politicians embrace the prospect of equal rights, they are relatively inexpensive for a Government or Parliament with a majority in favour to implement. Even David Cameron is in favour of equal civil marriage. Developing a strategy which will lift people from appalling poverty is so much harder because it involves a huge amount of political will to put the resources in to do it. The US and UK are, despite the talk of deficits and debts, among the most affluent countries in the world yet at the same time as Obama was speaking, the UK Parliament was debating a measure that will cut benefits for the poorest here.

To give Obama credit, he did recognise the need to tackle poverty:

 For we remember the lessons of our past, when twilight years were spent in poverty and parents of a child with a disability had nowhere to turn.
We do not believe that in this country freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few.  We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us at any time may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm.  The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, these things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us.

But I found this line depressing:

We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else.

If you grow up cold, or hungry, in poor housing, you don’t have the same life chances as everyone else. That’s the simple truth. Why do we accept that people should be born into bleak poverty at all? While I  realise we can’t change everything overnight, all politicians need to raise their sights and get more ambitious about eradicating poverty. For Liberal Democrats, this is a core part of our values. Our membership cards say that we seek to create a fair, free and open society where no-one is enslaved by poverty, ignorance and conformity. Obamacare across the Atlantic and raising the tax threshold and building more affordable housing here are good things but are nowhere near enough. The least we should be aiming for is that everyone has enough to eat and a warm home that meets their needs. Whilst it’s fine to give ourselves a pat on the back for small successes along the way, we can’t afford to lose a sense of urgency about the rest of the journey.

* Caron Lindsay is Editor of Liberal Democrat Voice and blogs at Caron's Musings

Read more by or more about , , , or .
This entry was posted in Op-eds.


  • Because of the separation of powers and checks and balances, anything Obama achieves is going to be diluted or costly. We’ve seen this in his first term, even when the Democrats had control of Congress: he had to make a lot of deals with individual members of Congress to get Obamacare through.

    In other words, hang on, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.

  • ‘It’s strange to think that a strong declaration in favour of gay rights by the “leader of the free world” is seen as remarkable.’ Unfortunately it’s not strange, and the fact that Obama did it as the leader of a country still riven with dispute over homosexuality and the rights of LGBT people to live open and honest lives was wonderful, and to be applauded.

    ‘While I’m glad to hear politicians embrace the prospect of equal rights, they are relatively inexpensive for a Government or Parliament with a majority in favour to implement.’ Well yes and no; embracing them openly brings as many brickbats as bouquets, as the debate in the UK over equal marriage has shown. And some of the brickbats are poisonous, and verge on the violent.

    Please don’t make the mistake of saying that some things are more equal than others. The reason poverty is hard to tackle is because it is a result of many different and complex factors, as well as how individuals themselves behave.

    Racism, homphobia, and mysogyny are choices that people, and societies, make. They have been, and in some places are, concious decisions to treat other people as lesser beings simply because they are a different complexion, love those of the same sex, or are female.

  • Liberal Eye 23rd Jan '13 - 4:31pm

    Caron – Obama is certainly the master of soaring rhetoric. But if you look behind the words a far darker picture emerges – one which reveals Obama working only for a tiny elite and quite happy to leave the 99.9% in the ditch. Under Bush inequality meant that 65 cents of every dollar in economic growth went to the top 1%; under Obama that figure has risen to an absolutely obscene 93% aided and abetted by a complete collapse in the rule of law with blatant frauds – for instance in foreclosure cases – often being rubber stamped by the courts and Obama’s appointees to high office actively frustrating legal redress for the wronged.

    Matt Stoller sets out the case against Obama and along the way debunks the notion that all his failures can be blamed on a hostile Congress.

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • Charley HastedCharley Hasted
    The line here is 'does this disability hurt the disabled person or the people around them more' imo. Haemophilia, Huntington's, etc unarguably cause more pai...
  • Brad Barrows
    @Martin I claim no great theological knowledge but I always thought the Roman Catholic Church believed that sexual intercourse was sinful unless it was to enab...
  • Tony Vickers
    Setting aside the eugenics argument, the bit I found shocking in Laurence’s piece is this: “ This should be a warning about letting those with money fund re...
  • Peter Kemp
    I still want to know if our candidate Richard Foorde is aware of 'Purple Spaceships over Yatton' 😃 😀 He should understand 😉...
  • Alex Macfie
    Only political nerds will remember the date of a referendum from 6 years ago. Ordinary voters will be basing their decisions on how current government policy af...