Conservative MP uses Parliamentary expenses to promote by-election candidate

UPDATE September 2008: the story below accurately reported that Stephen O’Brien’s website stated it was paid for by Parliamentary funds. It’s since been pointed out that at the time the website was in fact no longer being paid for by Parliamentary funds and the statement to the contrary has been removed from his site.

Trouble brewing for Conservative MP Stephen O’Brien, who has been promoting Edward Timpson – Conservative candidate in the Crewe and Nantwich by-election – on his website. The problem? The website is paid for by the Parliamentary funds. And that’d be funds for which the rules expressly forbid such campaigning. Tsk tsk.

A formal complaint has now been lodged with the Director of Finance and Administration of the House of Commons by Gwyn Griffiths, one of the local Liberal Democrat councillors. The key part of his complaint says:

On his website Conservative MP Stephen O’Brien promotes Edward Timpson, the Conservative candidate for Crewe and Nantwich, Stephen Mosley, Conservative candidate for Chester and Graham Evans, Conservative candidate for Weaver Vale.

He also uses the site to promote the policies and advance the cause of the Conservative Party in breach of the explicit rules laid down by the House.

Paragraph Seven of the ‘Rules and guidance on Members’ Websites funded from the Communications Allowance’ clearly states that it must not be used to fund party political activity or campaigning.

7. You must not use your website:
to campaign on behalf of or against any person seeking election
to advance perspectives or arguments with the intention of promoting the interests of any person, political party or organisation you support, or damaging the interests of any other such person, party or organisation.

On his website, Mr O’Brien states that it is paid for out of his parliamentary allowances.

Please launch an investigation into Mr O’Brien’s use of his Incidental Expenses Provision and Communications Allowance to promote the Conservative Party and their candidates.

Meanwhile, happy news from Tim Farron MP, who has been out meeting farmers and getting a very warm response for Elizabeth Shenton:

Read more by or more about .
This entry was posted in Lib Dem TV and Parliamentary by-elections.


  • It rather depends whether the website is paid for out of the communications allowance … rather than out of other Parliamentary allowances; doesn’t it?

  • And I can’t see a reference to Timpson, maybe I am going mad

  • The website says that it is being paid out of the ‘Incidental Expenses Provision’ and the rules in the Green Book permit websites to be maintained, but limit the use so that it is not permitted to use the funds for ‘party political matters’ – see here: for the Green Book and go to page 18.

    I have to say that I have looked at the website and have found it difficult to find the matters complained about.

  • That’s because they were whipped off there as soon as the complaint surfaced

  • Er, this website contains lots of little adverts asking people to vote for Elizabeth Shenton on May 22. Are the costs of upkeep of this site going on her expenses? Why do I think not?

Post a Comment

Lib Dem Voice welcomes comments from everyone but we ask you to be polite, to be on topic and to be who you say you are. You can read our comments policy in full here. Please respect it and all readers of the site.

If you are a member of the party, you can have the Lib Dem Logo appear next to your comments to show this. You must be registered for our forum and can then login on this public site with the same username and password.

To have your photo next to your comment please signup your email address with Gravatar.

Your email is never published. Required fields are marked *

Please complete the name of this site, Liberal Democrat ...?


Recent Comments

  • User AvatarDan M-B 13th Dec - 1:56am
    One bright spot - Alliance Party win from DUP in North Down.
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 13th Dec - 1:50am
    Chris Thank you. The relevance is that you can post your views anywhere on the internet. So any use of our editorial judgement here is...
  • User AvatarKit 13th Dec - 1:49am
    Choosing to run on the policy of 'revoking' the largest democratic mandate in British history. Maybe not such a good idea after all.
  • User AvatarPaul Walter 13th Dec - 1:46am
    David My name doesn’t have an “s” at the end of it. The point is, it is not censorship to make an editorial judgment. Like...
  • User AvatarCharles Pragnell 13th Dec - 1:46am
    Not looking good in East Dunbarton . BBC Scotland are saying its on a knife edge. She is likely to loose.Expected to loose all seats...
  • User Avatarchris moore 13th Dec - 1:44am
    Paul Walter 13th Dec '19 - 1:32am Chris Have you heard of Twitter? Blogger? WordPress? Facebook? I have, Paul. But it's too late at night...
Tue 7th Jan 2020