Tag Archives: benefits uprating bill

The Voice

Opinion: what living on benefits really means

By The Voice | Fri 25th January 2013 - 12:51 pm

Suel writes:

Every time I hear the phrase “a life on benefits”, it’s like a slap in the face to my brother, who lives in my spare room while looking for a job. He’s not lazy or a scrounger, he just can’t find a job. As Sarah Teather said two weeks ago

the term “scroungers” has become so pervasive in social consciousness that even those on benefits do not attempt to debunk the entire category, only to excuse themselves from the label.

I asked my brother if he was willing to share what his life on benefits was like:

Her brother writes:
I have …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 91 Comments
Stephen Tall

Benefits Uprating Bill: Andrew George and Charles Kennedy’s arguments AGAINST

By Stephen Tall | Tue 22nd January 2013 - 10:40 am

The Government last night won the vote for its Benefits Uprating Bill, with the third and final reading passed by 305 votes to 246. A fortnight ago, six Lib Dem MPs voted against or abstained from the Coalition line that benefits rises should be capped at the same rate as public sector pay (a below inflation 1% pa) for each of the next three years.

Andrew George, Charles Kennedy and other Lib Dems sought to move an amendment to the Bill, linking future welfare increases to the rise in average earnings. However, time expired before it was put …

Continue reading »
Posted in Parliament | Also tagged , and | 1 Comment
Stephen Tall

++ Government wins vote on Benefits Uprating Bill; 6 Lib Dem MPs rebel

By Stephen Tall | Tue 8th January 2013 - 7:45 pm

There were no serious doubts the Coalition Government’s Benefits Uprating Bill — pegging increases in welfare payments at a below-inflation 1%, the same as public sector wage rises, for the next three years — would be approved. The only question was the size of majority and how many Lib Dems would rebel (I’ve been keeping a running tally here this afternoon).

There were two votes tonight. First, a Labour amendment to the Bill, defeated by 321 votes to 262, a government majority of 59. Then a vote on the unamended second reading, which the government won by 324 votes to …

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 104 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Peter Davies
    Indeed. It is one of the few seats you can say there is absolutely no excuse for tactical voting. That does of course rule out our major tactic in bye-elections...
  • Chris Bertram
    We could make a start by putting in some effort in the upcoming Holborn and St Pancras by-election. Resigning ourselves to losing and therefore doing nothing f...
  • Mick Taylor
    When U joined the then Liberal Party in 1964 and then moved in to fight and win council seats in West Yorkshire, our message included local, regional, national ...
  • Matthew Harris
    @expats I referred to a massacre of Jews in Palestine (in Hebron) rather than to other massacres of Jews in other countries because it’s Israel/Palestine that...
  • Matthew Harris
    @CarlPierce I don’t think that when black, Jewish, gay or Muslim people draw attention to a comment that reflects a perjorative unconscious bias on the writer...