Tag Archives: benefits uprating bill

The Voice

Opinion: what living on benefits really means

By The Voice | Fri 25th January 2013 - 12:51 pm

Suel writes:

Every time I hear the phrase “a life on benefits”, it’s like a slap in the face to my brother, who lives in my spare room while looking for a job. He’s not lazy or a scrounger, he just can’t find a job. As Sarah Teather said two weeks ago

the term “scroungers” has become so pervasive in social consciousness that even those on benefits do not attempt to debunk the entire category, only to excuse themselves from the label.

I asked my brother if he was willing to share what his life on benefits was like:

Her brother writes:
I have …

Continue reading »
Posted in Op-eds | 91 Comments
Stephen Tall

Benefits Uprating Bill: Andrew George and Charles Kennedy’s arguments AGAINST

By Stephen Tall | Tue 22nd January 2013 - 10:40 am

The Government last night won the vote for its Benefits Uprating Bill, with the third and final reading passed by 305 votes to 246. A fortnight ago, six Lib Dem MPs voted against or abstained from the Coalition line that benefits rises should be capped at the same rate as public sector pay (a below inflation 1% pa) for each of the next three years.

Andrew George, Charles Kennedy and other Lib Dems sought to move an amendment to the Bill, linking future welfare increases to the rise in average earnings. However, time expired before it was put …

Continue reading »
Posted in Parliament | Also tagged , and | 1 Comment
Stephen Tall

++ Government wins vote on Benefits Uprating Bill; 6 Lib Dem MPs rebel

By Stephen Tall | Tue 8th January 2013 - 7:45 pm

There were no serious doubts the Coalition Government’s Benefits Uprating Bill — pegging increases in welfare payments at a below-inflation 1%, the same as public sector wage rises, for the next three years — would be approved. The only question was the size of majority and how many Lib Dems would rebel (I’ve been keeping a running tally here this afternoon).

There were two votes tonight. First, a Labour amendment to the Bill, defeated by 321 votes to 262, a government majority of 59. Then a vote on the unamended second reading, which the government won by 324 votes to …

Continue reading »
Posted in News | Also tagged , , , , , , and | 104 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Jana
    The British promised a Jewish state on land where 90% of the population was not Jewish. Hundreds of thousands of Jews then moved to the area so that by the end ...
  • Dav
    You can’t defend your way to a World Cup… or No. 10 Wasn't 'defend [his] way to No. 10' exactly what Mr Starmer did in 2024, with the Ming Vase St...
  • Mohammed Amin
    I don't agree with the affordable housing requirement at all, and would like this part of the law to be abolished. Developers should be free to build what they ...
  • Ruth Bright
    @Chris Cory I haven't posted here so I am not sure what question you are answering?...
  • Simon Costain
    Yes @JohnBicknell pro-Europe, green but sane...